Zielinski et al v. Linaweaver et al
| Jeremy Zielinski |
| Catherine C. Linaweaver and Charles E. Samuels |
| 1:2014cv03798 |
| May 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER for 21 Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and found none, I hereby ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Zielinski's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED , and the petition is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close the case. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Tankleff v. Senkowsk i, 135 F.3d 235, 241 (2d. Cir. 1998); United States v. Perez, 129 F.3d 255, 259-60 (2d Cir. 1997). Moreover, because Petitioner has not filed any objections to the R&R, Petitioner has waived his right to appeal. (See R&R at 11.) See also Caidor v . Onondaga Cty., 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008). The Clerk's Office is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Petitioner at his last known address: Albany County Correctional Facility, Offender ID 46319, 840 Albany Shaker Road, Albany, New York 12211. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/21/2015) (lmb) Modified on 12/21/2015 (lmb).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
