Ramirez et al v. M L Restaurant, Corp. et al
| Oscar Ramirez, Javier Guerrero, Geronimo Herculano, Pablo Rutilio, Maggie Andres Crecencio, Guillermo Alvarez, Juana Cruz Hernandez, Leonidas Mateo, Anyeli Ovalles Hernandez, Mirna Reyes Martinez, Ramon Del Rosario, Omar Taveras, Luis Espinal and Juan Salmeron |
| M L Restaurant, Corp., M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp., Antonio Manuel Liberato, Nelson Gomez, Lucy Gomez, Nana LNU, Romeo LNU, Victor Liberato, Fernando Liberato and Sarah Vallejo |
| 1:2014cv04030 |
| June 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Alison J. Nathan |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
ORDER re: 230 LETTER MOTION to Stay addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from MARTIN E. RESTITUYO dated 08/21/2020. filed by Antonio Manuel Liberato WHEREAS a hearing on Defendants' motion to stay the default provisions of the settlement agreement was held on March 22, 2021 (Dkt. 230); WHEREAS a new settlement agreement was reached by the parties; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants motion is dismissed as moot. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 3/22/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing
250
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: A hearing on Defendants' motion will be held on March 15, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. The parties must appear for the hearing by dialing 888-363-4749, using the access code 3121171, and the security code 4030; and IT I S FURTHER ORDERED THAT in advance of the hearing, the parties must meet and confer regarding the Burnside location (e.g., are rent payments current; did insurance cover some or all of the damage to the restaurant; are there plans to reopen and, if so, when). (As further set forth in this Order.) ( Telephone Conference set for 3/15/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge Valerie E. Caproni.) (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 3/1/2021) (cf)
|
|
Filing
245
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: No later than February 1, 2021, the parties must submit a joint letter detailing the status of this dispute. If Defendants intend to pursue their motion to stay, the joint letter should propose a briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' opposition and Defendants' reply briefs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/14/2021) (ama)
|
|
Filing
234
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on NOTICE OF MOTION TO STAY THE DEFAULT PROVISIONS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT: terminating 230 Letter Motion to Stay. ENDORSEMENT: By separate order, the parties are referred to Magistrate Judge Cave for a settlement conference. Defendants inexplicably filed their memorandum of law (Dkt. 233) under seal. No later than August 25, 2020, Defendants are directed to file the memorandum publicly. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 8/24/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 62 Letter, filed by Victor Liberato, M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp., Nelson Gomez, Nana LNU, M L Restaurant, Corp., Lucy Gomez, Antonio Manuel Liberato, Fernando Liberato, Sarah Vallejo, Attorney Jeffery Ala n Meyer and Sanjay V. Nair terminated. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Jeffery A. Meyer and Sanjay V. Nair as attorneys of record in this action and to remove them from the docket. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 10/14/2014) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
