Hernandez v. PFIP, LLC et al
Daniela Hernandez |
PFIP, LLC, PF Investors, LLC, 2480 Grand Concourse Fitness Group, LLC and PFNY, LLC |
1:2014cv04069 |
June 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Bronx |
Lorna G. Schofield |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 OPINION AND ORDER re: 72 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . filed by Ricardo Cordero, 69 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . filed by 2480 Grand Concourse Fitness Group, LLC, PFNY, LLC. For the reasons discuss ed above, the discrimination claims under Title VII and the NYSHRL (Counts I and III) are dismissed on consent. The retaliation claims under Title VII and the NYSHRL (Counts II and V) are dismissed without prejudice as provided above. Defendant Cor dero's motion for summary judgment on the NYSHRL aiding and abetting claim (Count IV) is granted, with prejudice as to the discrimination claim, and without prejudice to renewal as to the retaliation claim as provided above. Defendants' m otion for summary judgment on the NYCHRL retaliation claim (Count VII) is denied. The case will proceed against all Defendants on the NYCHRL discrimination and retaliation claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Nos. 69 and 72. A separate order scheduling dates for trial will follow. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/1/2015) (kgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.