Old Castle holdings ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
Plaintiff: Old Castle holdings ltd.
Defendant: The Republic of Argentina
Not Classified By Court: The Bank of New York
Case Number: 1:2014cv04091
Filed: June 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Loretta A Preska
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2017 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Loretta A. Preska. Judge Thomas P. Griesa is no longer assigned to the case. (ma)
April 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: NOW, THEREFORE, plaintiff, by its attorneys Moss & Kalish, PLLC, and the Republic, by its attorneys Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT: 1. This action is hereby dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) with prejudice and without costs, disbursements or fees to either side. 2. This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts which, when taken as a whole, shall constitute one and the same document; and a facsimile or copy signature shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/25/2016) (kl)
April 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER: On March 2, 2016, the court granted the Republic of Argentina's motion to vacate the pari passu injunctions upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent: (1) The Republic repeals all legislative obstacles to settlement with the FAA bondholders, including the Lock Law and the Sovereign Payment Law; (2) For all plaintiffs that entered into agreements in principle with the Republic on or before February 29, 2016, the Republic must make full payment in accordance with the specific terms of each such agreement. The Republic must also notify the court once those plaintiffs have all received full payment. Some plaintiffs appealed that March 2 vacatur order. On April 13, 2016, the Court of Appeals heard oral argument on the appeal and affirmed the vacatur order from the bench. The Court of Appeals then issued a written order, holding that this court did not abuse its discretion in ordering that the injunctions would be vacated upon satisfaction of the two conditions precedent. Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, No. 16-628, sum. order at 21 (2d Cir. Apr. 15, 2016). The Court of Appeals also noted that, at the time the Republic certifies it has satisfied the conditions precedent, this court should "take steps... to determine whether the conditions have indeed been met." Id. The Republic now certifies that it has satisfied the conditions precedent. In support of certification, the Republic submits two sworn declarations. The first is the declaration of Undersecretary of Finance Santiago Bausili, which shows that the Republic has repealed all legislative obstacles to settlement, including the Lock Law and the Sovereign Payment Law. The second is the declaration of Matthew Dukes, Director of Deutsche Bank Securities, which lists the settlement payments made to every plaintiff that entered into an agreement in principle by February 29, 2016. For each payment, the Dukes declaration confirms the plaintiffs name, settlement amount, and Fedwire reference number. Having carefully reviewed the Republic's submissions, the court now finds that the conditions precedent have been met. Accordingly, the injunctions are vacated in all cases. All stipulations of dismissal are to be filed with the court no later than 2:00 p.m. on April 25, 2016. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/22/2016) (tro)
April 22, 2016 Filing 57 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Michael A. Paskin dated April 22, 2016 re: notifying the Court that the Republic has satisfied the two conditions precedent to vacatur of the injunctions pursuant to this Court's March 2, 2016 Opinion and Order. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Santiago Bausili with Exhibits, #2 Declaration of Matthew Dukes, #3 Exhibit to Dukes Declaration)(tro)
April 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Argentina shall identify promptly all series of Exchange Bonds to be paid by BNY Mellon under the Indenture (the "Exchange Bonds Payments"), listing for each series the interest to be paid and the interest per $1000 or euro 1000 (as applicable) principal amount of each series of Exchange Bonds. Upon the fulfillment of the two conditions precedent referenced in the March 2 Order vacating the Injunctions, Argentina is authorized and directed to perform all of its obligations under the Indenture including, without limitation, payment of all fees, expenses and other amounts owed or payable to BNY Mellon thereunder. Upon determination by this Court that the two conditions precedent referenced in the March 2 Order have been met and receipt of the information set forth in the preceding paragraph, BNY Mellon is authorized and directed to distribute amounts received from Argentina, including, without limitation, the funds which Argentina transferred into BNY Mellon's accounts at Banco Central de la Republica Argentina on June 26, 2014, in accordance with the Indenture. The record date for purposes of such payments shall be the fifth Business Day (as defined in the Indenture) after this Court determines that the two conditions precedent referenced in the March 2 Order have been met and the payment date of such amounts shall be no later than 15 days following such record date, as Argentina shall instruct BNY Mellon with no less than three Business Days written notice, and payments shall be made to Holders (as defined in the Indenture) of record as of the close of business on the record date. In accordance with the Indenture, such payments shall be prefunded by 1:00 p.m. local time on the Business Day (as defined in the Indenture) prior to the Payment Date. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/19/2016) (kl)
April 19, 2016 Filing 55 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Michael A. Paskin dated April 19, 2016 re: requesting that the Court issue the Proposed Order attached hereto as Exhibit A. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Proposed Order)(Paskin, Michael)
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER: The court appreciates the arguments presented by all parties who spoke at yesterday's hearing. And the court does not take lightly the decision to lift the injunctions. But, ultimately, circumstances have changed so significantly as to render the injunctions inequitable and detrimental to the public interest. For the reasons outlined in the Indicative Ruling and this order, the court grants the Republic's motions to vacate the injunctions in all actions upon the occurrence of the two conditions precedent: (1) The Republic repeals all legislative obstacles to settlement with the FAA bondholders, including the Lock Law and the Sovereign Payment Law; (2) For all plaintiffs that entered into agreements in principle with the Republic on or before February 29, 2016, the Republic must make full payment in accordance with the specific terms of each such agreement. The Republic must also notify the court once those plaintiffs have all received full payment. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/2/2016) (Attachments: #1 RULE 62.1 INDICATIVE RULING)(kl)
March 1, 2016 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Thomas P. Griesa: Oral Argument held on 3/1/2016 re: (888 in 1:08-cv-06978-TPG) Letter, filed by The Republic of Argentina, (887 in 1:08-cv-06978-TPG) USCA Mandate Attorney Michael B. Mukasey, representing plaintiff EM Limited. Attorney Michael Shuster, representing plaintiffs Montreux and others. Attorney Michael A. Paskin, representing defendant, the Republic of Argentina.Attorney Christopher Clark, representing certain exchange bondholders. Attorneys Robert A. Cohen and Theodore B. Olson, representing plaintiff NML Capital, Ltd. Attorney Edward A. Friedman, representing plaintiffs Aurelius and Blue Angel. Attorney Michael C. Spencer, representing the Varela and other plaintiffs.Attorneys Anthony J. Costantini, Richard L. Levine, Anu Bhargava, Jennifer R. Scullion, P. Sabin Willett, and Jessica J. Sleater, representing certain other plaintiffs. Attorney Eric A. Schaffer, representing Bank of New YorkMellon. Hearing held.in re: requesting entry of an order by the court granting the Republic of Argentinas motions to vacate the injunctions. (See also Mandate (doc. no. 887) issued on February 24, 2016, and letterrequest dated February 25, 2016 (doc. no. 888).) The court reserves decision on all motions. See transcript.(Court Reporter Vincent Bologna) (Landers, Rigoberto)
February 29, 2016 Filing 53 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Michael A. Paskin dated February 29, 2016 re: enclosing Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant the Republic of Argentina's Motion for the Entry of Final Orders Conditionally Lifting the Pari Passu Injunctions. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Paskin, Michael)
February 29, 2016 Filing 52 RESPONSE of The Bank of New York Mellon to Motion of The Republic of Argentina Seeking to Vacate Injunctions. Document filed by The Bank of New York. (Schaffer, Eric)
February 29, 2016 Filing 51 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #33 Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines,,,,,, . Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MICHAEL A. PASKIN, #2 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF UNDERSECRETARY OF FINANCE SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #3 Exhibit 1 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #4 Exhibit 2 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #5 Exhibit 3 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #6 Exhibit 4 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #7 Exhibit 5 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #8 Exhibit 6 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #9 Exhibit 7 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #10 Exhibit 8 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #11 Exhibit 9 TO DECLARATION OF SANTIAGO BAUSILI, #12 Text of Proposed Order)(Hernandez, Damaris)
February 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER: Certain plaintiffs have requested an adjournment of the hearing presently scheduled for 1:30 p.m. on March 1, 2016. In light of the circumstances underlying this litigation, it is desirable for all parties to know the court's disposition with respect to the injunctions and to arrive at a prompt resolution so that any order may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. All plaintiffs have had notice of the Republic of Argentina's motion to vacate the injunctions in all cases since February 11, 2016. Many plaintiffs have already submitted voluminous briefs on this issue, both in this court and in the Court of Appeals. And, as outlined in the court's February 25 scheduling order, the parties may file further briefing, if they wish, by noon on February 29, 2016. Before this court issues any formal order on the Republic's motion to vacate, all parties will have had a meaningful opportunity to be heard both orally and in written briefs. The hearing will take place at 1:30 p.m. on March 1, 2016. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/26/2016) (kl)
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER: On February 19, 2016, this court issued a Rule 62.1 Indicative Ruling. The Court of Appeals remanded the above-captioned actions after hearing argument on February 24, 2016. The Court of Appeals also instructed the Republic of Argentina to file a motion requesting that this court formally enter the Indicative Ruling as an order, giving notice of the motion to all parties, and affording those parties an opportunity to be heard in this court. The Republic of Argentina has now filed such a motion. The court will hear argument on the motion in these actions at 1:30 p.m. on March 1, 2016. Any party wishing to submit further papers may do so by noon on February 29, 2016. SO ORDERED. (Oral Argument set for 3/1/2016 at 01:30 PM before Judge Thomas P. Griesa.) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/25/2016) (kl)
February 25, 2016 Filing 47 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Michael A. Paskin dated February 25, 2016 re: entry of the Republic's motions and requesting that this Court hold a hearing on the Republic's Motions to Vacate the Injunctions Entered by this Court on November 21, 2012, and October 30, 2015. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Paskin, Michael)
February 24, 2016 Filing 48 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to #32 Notice of Appeal, filed by The Republic of Argentina USCA Case Number 15-3626. The Republic of Argentina has moved to dismiss with prejudice all of the appeals consolidated respectively under 15-1060(L) and 15-3675(L) in order to allow the district court, upon motion, to enter the order indicated in its indicative ruling of February 19, 2016. Plaintiffs-appellees in 15-3675(L) have moved to refer certain motions on that docket to this panel. Following review of the parties submissions in support of and opposition to dismissal and referral, as well as oral argument, the motion to refer appellants motion for remand is GRANTED, but that motion for remand is now reviewed as a motion to dismiss with prejudice consistent with Argentinas amendment at argument. The two pending motions to dismiss with prejudice are GRANTED pursuant to the parties agreement, confirmed in open court, as follows: 1. Before the indicative ruling is formally entered as an order, Argentina will file a motion in the district court seeking such relief, giving notice of the motion to all parties, and affording them an opportunity to be heard in the district court. 2. Argentina agrees to a stay of up to two weeks of any district court order formalizing the indicative ruling so that parties opposing the order can file a notice of appeal within two business days and seek a further stay of the order from a motions panel of this court pending appeal. Any such appeals will be consolidated for review by this court, and any party seeking a stay is hereby excused from further requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 8. Jurisdiction over these cases is hereby returned to the district court with the parties agreement to the aforestated conditions, which contemplate that the district court will enter no order formalizing its indicative ruling except on a motion from Argentina, with notice to all parties and an opportunity to be heard, and that any order will be stayed for up to two weeks. All other pending motions on both dockets are hereby DENIED as moot.. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 02/24/2016. (nd)
February 19, 2016 Filing 46 DECLARATION of Mark L. Kalish in Support. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd.. (Schwartzman, James)
February 19, 2016 Filing 45 RULE 62.1 INDICATIVE RULING: For these reasons, the court now indicates that it would vacate the injunctions upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent: (1) The Republic repeals all legislative obstacles to settlement with the FAA bondholders, including the Lock Law and the Sovereign Payment Law; (2) For all plaintiffs that enter into agreements in principle with the Republic on or before February 29, 2016, the Republic must make full payment in accordance with the specific terms of each such agreement. The Republic must also notify the court once those plaintiffs have all received full payment. If the Court of Appeals remands to allow this court to grant the Republic's motion to vacate, the injunctions will be lifted automatically upon fulfillment of these two conditions. (As further set forth in this Ruling) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/19/2016) (kl)
February 19, 2016 Filing 44 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Michael A. Paskin dated February 19, 2016 re: enclosing copies of EM Limited and Montreux Submissions. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 EM Limited and Montreux Submissions)(Hernandez, Damaris)
February 19, 2016 Filing 43 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #33 Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines,,,,,, . Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Second Supplemental Declaration of Michael A. Paskin, #2 Supplemental Declaration of Santiago Bausili)(Hernandez, Damaris)
February 17, 2016 Filing 42 DECLARATION of Michael A. Paskin in Support re: #33 Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines,,,,,,. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Paskin, Michael)
February 12, 2016 Filing 41 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Michael A. Paskin dated February 12, 2016 re: enclosing copies of EM Limited and Montreux Submissions. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 EM Limited and Montreux Submissions)(Paskin, Michael)
February 11, 2016 Filing 40 DECLARATION of Santiago Bausili in Support re: #33 Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines,,,,,,. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Paskin, Michael)
February 11, 2016 Filing 39 DECLARATION of Michael A. Paskin in Support re: #33 Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines,,,,,,. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-K)(Paskin, Michael)
February 11, 2016 Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #33 Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines,,,,,, . Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Paskin, Michael)
February 11, 2016 Filing 37 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael A Paskin on behalf of The Republic of Argentina. (Paskin, Michael)
February 11, 2016 Filing 36 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Aaron Herman on behalf of The Republic of Argentina. (Herman, David)
February 11, 2016 Filing 35 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Damaris Hernandez on behalf of The Republic of Argentina. (Hernandez, Damaris)
February 11, 2016 Filing 34 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Slifkin on behalf of The Republic of Argentina. (Slifkin, Daniel)
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: It is hereby ORDERED Plaintiffs show cause before this Court on February 18, 2016, why this Court should not issue an indicative ruling pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1 indicating that this Court will, upon remand from the Second Circuit, issue an order pursuant to Rules 54(b), 60(b)(5) and/or 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, vacating the injunction entered in this matter on October 30, 2015, without further action of the Court, upon the occurrence of the following conditions precedent: (As further set forth in this Order.) Show Cause Response due by 2/16/2016, at noon and Replies due by 2/18/2016, at noon. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/11/2016) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(kko) Modified on 2/11/2016 (kko).
November 12, 2015 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #32 Notice of Appeal. (tp)
November 12, 2015 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #32 Notice of Appeal, filed by The Republic of Argentina were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp)
November 10, 2015 Filing 32 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #31 Memorandum & Opinion,,,. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 0208-11612536. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Boccuzzi, Carmine)
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Vacated as per Judge's Order dated 4/22/2016, Doc. #58.OPINION AND ORDER #105995: For these reasons, the court grants plaintiffs' motions for specific performance. The Republic is ordered to specifically perform its obligations to plaintiffs under the pari passu clause by making ratable payments to plaintiffs any time it makes, or attempts to make, payments on the Exchange Bonds. The Republic is enjoined from violating the pari passu clause and from taking any action to evade the purposes and directives of this order. Within three days, the Republic shall provide copies of this order to all participants in the payment process of the Exchange Bonds. These participants shall be bound by this order, as provided by Rule 65(d)(2), and prohibited from aiding and abetting any violation of this order. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 10/30/2015) (kl) Modified on 11/2/2015 (ca). Modified on 4/22/2016 (tro).
October 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: The court will hear argument on the motions for specific performance filed in these cases at 2:00p.m. on October 28, 2015. (Oral Argument set for 10/28/2015 at 02:00 PM before Judge Thomas P. Griesa.) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 10/15/2015) (kl)
October 13, 2015 Filing 29 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from David B. Gelfarb dated 10/13/2015 re: Plaintiff joining in reply papers filed in motion for specific performance of the Equal Treatment Provision of the Pari Passu Clause of the 1994 Fiscal Agency Agreement filed on October 9, 2015 in 14 Civ. 8601 and 14 Civ. 8988. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
September 28, 2015 Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition to the Motion for Specific Performance, dated September 25, 2015. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Boccuzzi, Carmine)
September 28, 2015 Filing 27 DECLARATION of Elizabeth M. Hanly in Opposition to the Motion for Specific Performance, dated September 25, 2015 . Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-O, #2 Exhibit P-R, #3 Exhibit S, #4 Exhibit T-U, #5 Exhibit V-W, #6 Exhibit X, #7 Exhibit Y-Z)(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
September 8, 2015 Filing 26 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from David B. Gelfarb dated 09/08/2015 re: Plaintiff joining in motion for specific performance of the Equal Treatment Provision of the Pari Passu Clause of the 1994 Fiscal Agency Agreement filed on August 14, 2015 in 14 Civ. 8601 and 14 Civ. 8988. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
September 3, 2015 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Notice to Attorney David Bruce Gelfarb to RE-FILE Document #25 MOTION Miscellaneous Relief & Joining in motion filed in 14 Civ 8601 and 14 Civ 8988. Use the event type Letter found under the event list Other Documents. (db)
September 2, 2015 Filing 25 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - MOTION Miscellaneous Relief & Joining in motion filed in 14 Civ 8601 and 14 Civ 8988. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd. Return Date set for 10/9/2015 at 09:30 AM.(Gelfarb, David) Modified on 9/3/2015 (db).
June 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER #105577: For the reasons given above, the court concludes that plaintiffs in these thirty-six actions have satisfied their burden for obtaining summary judgment. The motions for partial summary judgment are hereby granted. It is hereby declared, adjudged, and decreed that the Republic has violated, and continues to violate, Paragraph (1)(c) of the 1994 Fiscal Agency Agreement. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 6/5/2015) (kl) Modified on 6/16/2015 (soh).
April 8, 2015 Filing 23 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from David B. Gelfarb dated 04/08/2015 re: Letter confirming that plaintiff is joining in motion for summary judgment recently fully submitted in 14 Civ 8601. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
March 18, 2015 Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #16 MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Boccuzzi, Carmine)
March 18, 2015 Filing 21 DECLARATION of Elizabeth M. Hanly, dated March 17, 2015 in Opposition re: #16 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-K, #2 Exhibits L-T, #3 Exhibits U-Z, #4 Exhibits AA-BB, #5 Exhibit CC)(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
March 18, 2015 Filing 20 RESPONSE re: #16 MOTION for Summary Judgment . /Response of the Republic of Argentina to Plaintiff's Local Civil Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Boccuzzi, Carmine)
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (12 in 1:14-cv-08946-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (11 in 1:14-cv-07739-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (18 in 1:14-cv-04092-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (6 in 1:14-cv-08739-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (12 in 1:14-cv-08947-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (11 in 1:14-cv-08601-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (9 in 1:14-cv-08242-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (17 in 1:14-cv-07258-TPG) Letter filed by Republic of Argentina, (18 in 1:14-cv-04091-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (13 in 1:14-cv-08303-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (12 in 1:14-cv-08988-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, (14 in 1:14-cv-08630-TPG) Letter filed by The Republic of Argentina, re: Briefing schedule. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/17/2015) (ajs)
February 13, 2015 Filing 18 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Carmine D. Boccuzzi Jr. dated February 13, 2015 re: motion for summary judgment briefing schedule. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina.(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
February 10, 2015 Filing 17 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from David B. Gelfarb dated 02/10/2015 re: Withdrawal of order to show cause submittted June 26, 2014. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
February 10, 2015 Filing 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd.. Responses due by 2/24/2015(Gelfarb, David)
October 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: On August 20, 2014, the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a certificate of default against the defendant in this case. Shortly thereafter, the defendant submitted a letter requesting the court lift the entry of default. The court finds that the defendant has shown good cause to lift the entry of default. Therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c), the court grants defendant's request and sets aside the entry of default. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 10/3/2014) (ajs)
October 1, 2014 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT AMENDED COMPLAINT. Notice to Attorney David Gelfarb RE: Document No. #13 Amended Complaint. Duplicate Entry of docket # 12. (laq)
September 30, 2014 Filing 14 ANSWER to #12 Amended Complaint. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina.(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
September 30, 2014 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against The Republic of Argentina.Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd.. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
September 16, 2014 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against The Republic of Argentina.Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd.. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
September 16, 2014 Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Mark L. Kalish dated 09/16/1960 re: Letter in opposition to defendant's letter request to set aside certificate of default entered by the Clerk.. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
September 12, 2014 Filing 10 AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina. (Boccuzzi, Carmine)
August 26, 2014 Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Mark L. Kalish dated 08/26/2014 re: Defendant's letter in opposition to plaintiff's letter application for an order setting aside the certificate of default entered by the Clerk.. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
August 22, 2014 Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Thomas P. Griesa from Carmine D. Boccuzzi dated August 22, 2014 re: Request to Set Aside Certificate of Default. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina.(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
August 22, 2014 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by The Republic of Argentina.(Boccuzzi, Carmine)
August 20, 2014 Filing 6 Vacated as per Judge's Order dated 10/3/2014, Doc. # 15 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to The Republic of Argentina. (jno) Modified on 10/3/2014 (ajs). Modified on 10/3/2014 (ajs).
August 20, 2014 Filing 5 REQUEST TO ENTER DEFAULT against Republic of Argentina Affidavit (non-motion) in Support of Request for Certificate of Default. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(Gelfarb, David)
June 12, 2014 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:02-cv-03804-TPG. Notice of Assignment to follow. (pgu)
June 12, 2014 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to Judge Thomas P. Griesa. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (pgu)
June 12, 2014 Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis is so designated. (pgu)
June 12, 2014 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT PDF OF CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney David Bruce Gelfarb, to submit PDF of the Civil Cover Sheet. Email a copy of Civil Cover Sheet to: caseopenings@nysd.uscourts.gov. (laq)
June 11, 2014 Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE. All Defendants. Service was accepted by Arlene Flores AVP-Compliance Dept.. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd.. (Gelfarb, David)
June 6, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO E-MAIL PDF. Note to Attorney David Bruce Gelfarb for noncompliance with Section 14.2 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions. E-MAIL the PDF for Document #3 Statement of Relatedness to: caseopenings@nysd.uscourts.gov. (js)
June 5, 2014 Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 02-cv-3808. Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd..(js) (jd).
June 5, 2014 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (js)
June 5, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Republic of Argentina. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 465401097003)Document filed by Old Castle holdings ltd.(js) (jd).
June 5, 2014 SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Republic of Argentina. (js)
June 5, 2014 Case Designated ECF. (js)
June 5, 2014 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Thomas P. Griesa as possibly related to 02-cv-3808. (js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Old Castle holdings ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Republic of Argentina
Represented By: Michael A Paskin
Represented By: Damaris Hernandez
Represented By: Daniel Slifkin
Represented By: Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr
Represented By: David Aaron Herman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Old Castle holdings ltd.
Represented By: David Bruce Gelfarb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: The Bank of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?