Hernandez et al v. Gonzalez et al
| Mario Hernandez, Candido Marco, Eliseo Puente Romero, Jose Luis Rodriguez, Leonides Rosales, Luis Fernando Deaquino and Rene Torres Gonzalez |
| JRPAC Inc., Jude Rodrigues, Chad Leo, Premendra Chaouhan and Peter Doe |
| 1:2014cv04176 |
| June 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
OPINION & ORDER re: 91 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Leonides Rosales, Jose Luis Rodriguez, Mario Hernandez, Eliseo Puente Romero, Candido Marco, Rene Torres Gonzalez. For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby awards and directs defendants to pay to plaintiffs' counsel attorneys' fees in the amount of $51,425 and costs in the amount of $6,958.85, for a total award to counsel of $58,383.85. The award is, of course, in addition to the recovery previously awarded to the six plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 91. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/6/2017) (mro)
|
|
Filing
84
OPINION & ORDER: The Court hereby directs the parties to submit revised proposed damages calculations consistent with this Opinion. The Court hereby sets the following schedule for such submissions: By June 17, 2016, plaintiffs shall provide a lett er to defendants (but not then filed on ECF) itemizing, by plaintiff and by claim, plaintiffs' proposed damages calculation and explaining, clearly and with specificity, the basis for each calculation. By June 24, 2016, defendants shall provid e a letter to plaintiffs stating whether they have any objections to any of plaintiffs' proposed damages calculations, and if so, explaining, clearly and with specificity, the basis for each point of disagreement, and stating (and explaining the basis for) defendants' contrary calculation. In the event defendants disagree as to any aspect of plaintiffs' damages calculation, the parties are directed to meet and confer to attempt to resolve any discrepancies. By June 30, 2016, either (1) the parties shall jointly submit a proposed damages calculation, or (2) plaintiffs shall file its proposed damages calculation, in which case defendants shall file any opposition by July 6, 2016, and plaintiffs shall file a reply by July 12, 2016. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/9/2016) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
