Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
| Royal Park Investments SA/NV |
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| 1:2014cv04394 |
| June 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Alison J. Nathan |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
646
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 453 Motion for Discovery. Now before the Court is plaintiff's Motion Regarding Sampling-Related Expert Discovery, (Dkt. No. 453), in which RPI seeks an order "allowing the parties to conduct sampling-relat ed expert discovery." Pl. Mot. at 1. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above, plaintiff's motion to permit sampling-related expert discovery is DENIED. The parties shall submit a proposed revised expert discovery schedule within 10 days of this Order. See Dkt. No. 443, at 3. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 9/28/2018) (cf)
|
|
Filing
607
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Royal Park's motion to certify this matter as a class action is DENIED. Royal Park's application to seal documents submitted to the Court in connection with Deutsche Bank's opposition papers is GRANTED. Both parties shall, within ten business days of this Order, ensure that there are appropriately redacted copies of any memorandum or exhibit not previously filed on the public docket, including slip sheets to reflect sealed exhibi ts as appropriate. The Court will file unredacted copies under SEAL forthwith. Royal Park's motion to strike Deutsche Bank's affirmative defense is GRANTED and the Report and Recommendation of Judge Moses is adopted in its entirety. Becaus e it arguably contains reference to information that Royal Park has requested be maintained under seal, this Order will be filed under TEMPORARY SEAL. The parties are directed to meet and confer and to advise the Court in writing within ten business days of this Order whether they believe that any portion should be redacted prior to its public docketing. The Court will publicly docket an Order indicating the Court's resolution of the motions. This resolves Dkt. Nos. 372, 379, and 399. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/29/2018) (mml)
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons in this Memorandum and Order, Defendant's motion is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff has withdrawn its TIA claim and its derivative claims are dismissed with prejudice. The remaining claims rema in in the case. A case management conference will be scheduled by separate order. Per the Court's April 10, 2015 Order, the parties shall submit a letter regarding settlement within three weeks of the date of this decision. See Dkt. No. 63. This resolves Dkt. No. 54. So ordered. Granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion to Dismiss. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/3/2016) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
