Vringo, Inc. v. ZTE Corporation et al
| Vringo, Inc. |
| ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA Inc. |
| ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA Inc. |
| ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA Inc. |
| 1:2014cv04988 |
| July 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Corrected): For the foregoing reasons, ZTE's motion to modify the July 24, 2015 order[14-cv-4988, DI 198; 15-cv-0986, DI 125] is denied in all respects both on the law and in the exercise of discretion. While ZTE has stated in its present motion that it does not intend to comply with the July 24, 2015 order regardless of the outcome of its motion and that "the time would be ripe for the Court to consider what sanction should be imposed for such noncompli ance" in the event its motion is denied, the Court declines to take that step at this time. ZTE and Mr. Guo may reconsider their position in light of this ruling. Should they fail to do so, Vringo presumably will move for sanctions and the Court then will deal with the issue after affording all parties an opportunity to be heard. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/11/2015, Corrected by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/12/2015.) (mro)
|
|
Filing
218
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: (125 in 1:15-cv-00986-LAK-FM) MOTION to Modify the Court's July 24, 2015 Order re: (110) Order to Show Cause . filed by ZTE CORPORATION, (198 in 1:14-cv-04988-LAK-FM) MOTION to Modify the Court 's July 24, 2015 Order re: (167) Order to Show Cause . filed by ZTE USA Inc., ZTE Corporation. For the foregoing reasons, ZTE's motion to modify the July 24, 2015 order [14-cv-4988, DI 198; 15-cv-0986, DI 125] is denie d in all respects both on the law and in the exercise of discretion. While ZTE has stated in its present motion that it does not intend to comply with the July 24, 2015 order regardless of the outcome of its motion and that "the time would b e ripe for the Court to consider what sanction should be imposed for such noncompliance" in the event its motion is denied, the Court declines to take that step at this time. ZTE and Mr. Guo may reconsider their position in light of this ruli ng. Should they fail to do so, Vringo presumably will move for sanctions and the Court then will deal with the issue after affording all parties an opportunity to be heard. (As further set forth in this Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/11/2015) (mro)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the foregoing reasons, Vringo's motion for a preliminary injunction is granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, pending the final determination of this action, defendants,and all of their subsidiaries, of ficers, agents, servants and employees and those persons in active concert or participation with any of them who receive actual notice of this order, shall not use, reference, or disclose any Confidential Information, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the Non-Disclosure Agreement entered into between ZTE and Vringo, Inc., dated December 6, 2013, in any manner inconsistent with the terms of that Non-Disclosure Agreement. This includes, but is not limited to, any use, reference, or disclosure o f any information provided by Vringo pursuant to the Non-Disclosure Agreement, including the December 10, 2013 presentation, in any existing or future judicial proceeding. The foregoing constitute the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/3/2015) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
