Hirsch v. Campaniello Soho, Inc. et al
| Zoltan Hirsch |
| Campaniello Soho, Inc. and 225 East 57th Street Owners, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv05097 |
| July 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Lorna G. Schofield |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER: WHEREAS on November 18, 2015, parties filed a joint letter stating that the settlement of the pending motion at Docket No. 41 has not been approved by Defendants. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall attend a conference on December 14, 2015, at 11:00 a.m., for an oral ruling on the motion at Docket No. 41 in the event that a settlement is not reached by that date. (Oral Argument set for 12/14/2015 at 11:00 AM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/18/2015) (kl)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER & OPINION: For the foregoing reasons, judgment is RESERVED on Defendants' motion to dismiss pending the Court's findings after an evidentiary hearing. The parties are directed to appear for an evidentiary hearing on February 23, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. Plaintiff Zoltan Hirsch shall be present for the hearing. The parties shall make no substantive submissions in anticipation of the hearing without leave of the Court. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 2/17/2015) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
