Holmes v. The City Of New York , et al
Plaintiff: Marisa Holmes
Defendant: The City Of New York, Kennth Odonnell, Anthony Bologna, Fernando Centenotalavera, John Does and Richard Roes
Case Number: 1:2014cv05253
Filed: July 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 182 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 134 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Fernando Centeno-talavera, The City Of New York, Kennth Odonnell, Anthony Bologna, 138 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Marisa Holmes. For the for egoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to count one of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to the extent that it asserts false arrest, trespass, First Amendment retaliation, and abuse of process claims. Count one is also dismissed to the extent that it asserts a fabrication of evidence claim against Defendants Centeno-Talavera and Bologna. Count one survives to the extent that it asserts a fabrication of evidence claim against Defendant O'Donnell, and to t he extent that the parties have not yet moved for, or the Court has not already denied, summary judgment on Plaintiff's First Amendment interference, unconstitutional search, conversion, and failure to intercede claims. Defendants' motion f or summary judgment is also granted as to counts two and three of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, which assert claims for supervisory liability against Defendants O'Donnell and Bologna, and claims for municipal liability against the City of New York, respectively. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety. By separate order entered today, the Court directs Plaintiff to show cause why her claim for First Amendment interference should not also be dismissed, an d directs the parties to file a joint letter motion as to the status of any other claims that were not addressed in the parties' summary judgment motion practice within fourteen days. The final pre-trial conference in this case is adjourned to J une 22, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. The Court will renew the reference of this case to the Mediation program, and the parties must promptly participate in a settlement conference. If no settlement is concluded, the parties must confer and make submissions in advance of the final pre-trial conference as provided in the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order. (Docket entry no. 17.) This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry numbers 134 and 138. SO ORDERED., ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/22/2018 at 10:30 AM before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/29/2018) (ama) Modified on 3/29/2018 (ama).
February 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 80 MOTION to Amend/Correct 13 Amended Complaint, Motion for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint filed by Marisa Holmes, 78 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 76 Memorandum & Opinion Motion for partial reconsideration concerning Plaintiff's claims for excessive force filed by Marisa Holmes. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied, Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is denied, and Plaintiff's objections to the May and June Discovery Orders are overruled. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry nos. 78, 80, 108, and 114. Pursuant to this Court's prior order (docket entry no. 113), the dead line for filing dispositive motions is hereby extended to March 10, 2017. The final pre-trial conference is adjourned to June 2, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. This case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Ellis for general pre-trial management. (Motions due by 3/10/2017., Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/2/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 2/8/2017) (cla)
March 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION to Amend/Correct 13 Amended Complaint, , filed by Marisa Holmes, 21 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to 12(b)(6) & 12(c), filed by Fernando Centenotalavera, The City Of New Yo rk Kennth Odonnell, Anthony Bologna. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted as to Plaintiff's claims for relief under Section 1983 based on the theories of malicious prosecution, assault, and battery, and oth erwise is denied. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is denied. Plaintiff may move for further leave to amend solely to provide additional factual material relevant to her claim for malicious prosecution for obstruction of governmental admini stration. Any such motion must be filed by March 21, 2016. This Order resolves docket entry nos. 21 and 56. This case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Ellis for general pre-trial management (see docket entry no. 16). (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/4/2016) (spo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holmes v. The City Of New York , et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marisa Holmes
Represented By: Jeffrey Adam Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City Of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kennth Odonnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Bologna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fernando Centenotalavera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Roes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?