Peguero v. Smith

Peguero v. Smith

Petitioner:	Ramon Peguero
Respondent:	Joseph T. Smith
Case Number:	1:2014cv06128
Filed:	July 23, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Ulster
Presiding Judge:	Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 9, 2018	Filing 53 OPINION & ORDER re: 48 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 38 Clerk's Judgment,. filed by Ramon Peguero. For the reasons stated, the Court adopts the Report with the exception of its finding on timeliness, denies the habeas petition, an d denies the Rule 60(b) motion as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate docket entry 48 and close this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/9/2018) (rj)
April 11, 2016	Filing 37 ORDER: As no objections to the Report were filed, the Court has reviewed Judge Dolinger's well reasoned Report for clear error. After careful review of the record, the Court finds none and thus adopts the Report in its entirety. It is therefore ordered that the petition is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/11/2016) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 9, 2018

Filing 53 OPINION & ORDER re: 48 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 38 Clerk's Judgment,. filed by Ramon Peguero. For the reasons stated, the Court adopts the Report with the exception of its finding on timeliness, denies the habeas petition, an d denies the Rule 60(b) motion as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate docket entry 48 and close this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/9/2018) (rj)

April 11, 2016

Filing 37 ORDER: As no objections to the Report were filed, the Court has reviewed Judge Dolinger's well reasoned Report for clear error. After careful review of the record, the Court finds none and thus adopts the Report in its entirety. It is therefore ordered that the petition is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/11/2016) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peguero v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Ramon Peguero
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph T. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?