Swiderski v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Swiderski v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Tatiana Swiderski
Defendant:	Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2014cv06307
Filed:	August 8, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	J. Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 18, 2017	Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Urban Outfitters, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, summary judgment is granted in fa vor of Defendant as to (1) Plaintiff's constructive discharge claim and (2) Plaintiff's claim based on customer harassment under the NYSHRL. Summary judgment is denied as to all other claims. Counsel for the parties shall confer regarding t rial dates and shall, on or before January 5, 2018, submit a joint letter proposing trial dates between February and June of 2018. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 67. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 12/18/2017) (ama)
June 4, 2015	Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint, filed by Urban Outfitters, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Urban Outfitters's motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 6. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/4/2015) (kko)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 18, 2017

Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Urban Outfitters, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, summary judgment is granted in fa vor of Defendant as to (1) Plaintiff's constructive discharge claim and (2) Plaintiff's claim based on customer harassment under the NYSHRL. Summary judgment is denied as to all other claims. Counsel for the parties shall confer regarding t rial dates and shall, on or before January 5, 2018, submit a joint letter proposing trial dates between February and June of 2018. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 67. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 12/18/2017) (ama)

June 4, 2015

Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint, filed by Urban Outfitters, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Urban Outfitters's motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 6. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/4/2015) (kko)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swiderski v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tatiana Swiderski
Represented By:	Christopher L. Van De Water
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Represented By:	Mercedes Colwin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?