Arnold v. D'Amato et al

Plaintiff: Mary Arnold
Defendant: Alfonse D'Amato, Armand D'Amato, Jerry Barbanel, Park Strategies, LLC and Precision Discovery, LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv06457
Filed: August 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2015 Filing 30 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to compel arbitration is granted. The case is stayed pending the outcome of arbitration. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion pending at docket number 5, and to plac e this case on the suspense docket. The parties are directed to submit a joint status letter to the Court, advising it as to the status of arbitration proceedings, every 90 days, measured from the date of this Opinion. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/23/2015) (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnold v. D'Amato et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Arnold
Represented By: Paul Amandio Batista
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alfonse D'Amato
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Pearson
Represented By: Douglas Holden Wigdor
Represented By: Michael John Willemin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armand D'Amato
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Pearson
Represented By: Douglas Holden Wigdor
Represented By: Michael John Willemin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Barbanel
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Pearson
Represented By: Douglas Holden Wigdor
Represented By: Michael John Willemin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Park Strategies, LLC
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Pearson
Represented By: Douglas Holden Wigdor
Represented By: Michael John Willemin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Precision Discovery, LLC
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Pearson
Represented By: Douglas Holden Wigdor
Represented By: Michael John Willemin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?