G-Concept Limited v. A.H. Schreiber Co. Incorporated et al
| G-Concept Limited |
| A.H. Schreiber Co. Incorporated and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2014cv06581 |
| August 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Francis dated May 22, 2015, after an inquest on damages following this Court's determination that the plaintiff was entitled to a default judg ment against the defendant. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for such objections has passed. The Court has also reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds that it should be adopted. The Court therefor e adopts the Report and Recommendation and directs the Clerk to enter Judgment in accordance with that Report and Recommendation, namely in the amount of $2,790,595.00, plus prejudgment interest at nine percent per annum accruing from January 16, 2014, to the date of Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment accordingly and to close this case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/17/2015) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
