Baez v. Anne Fontaine USA, Inc. et al
| Rochelly Baez |
| Anne Fontaine USA, Inc., Ari Zlotkin and Cindy D'Luzansky |
| 1:2014cv06621 |
| August 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
OPINION & ORDER: Rochelly Baez brings this employment discrimination suit against Anne Fontaine USA, Inc. ("AFUSA"), her former employer, and two of its executives, Ari Zlotkin and Cindy D'Luzansky. It is undisputed that Baez's coworkers discussed an incident in which plaintiff attended a meeting with Zlotkin, AFUSA's chief executive officer ("CEO"), wearing a revealing shirt and no bra. The statements by the coworkers are referred to throughout the part ies' papers as "rumors" - though the facts are materially uncontested. Baez complained about her coworkers' talk. Following this incident, a certain amount of office drama ensued. (As further set forth in this Order.) There is no legal reason why the gender or number of speakers alters the analysis. For the reasons set forth above, defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Because none of Baez's claims against Zlotkin withstands summary judgment, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate him from the case. Ari Zlotkin terminated. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/5/2017) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
