Geismann v. ZocDoc, Inc.
| Radha Geismann |
| Zocdoc, Inc., and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2014cv07009 |
| August 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Louis L. Stanton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 151 Communications Act of 1934 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER: This matter coming before the Court on the request of defendant ZocDoc, Inc. for an Order disbursing the funds held by the Clerk of Court in an interest-bearing account to plaintiff Radha Geismann M.D., P.C. ("Geismann"), the request being agreed upon by all parties, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Clerk of Court shall pay the principal balance of $20,052.12 plus any interest accrued to Geismann, in care of its counsel Max G. Marg ulis, Margulis Law Group, 28 Old Belle Monte Rd., Chesterfield, MO 63017. The Clerk of Court shall deduct from the investment the authorized fee from the earned income, as authorized by the Judicial Conference and set by the Director of the Administrative Office. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 12/18/2020) (rro) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER: The name "ZocDoc" in paragraph no. 1 of the Order dated April 7, 2020 (Doc.# 129) is amended to read "Geismann". So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/8/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER terminating 127 Letter Motion for Discovery. ZocDoc must produce all retainer agreements involving all counsels in this case, and correspondence (or portions) relevant thereto, but not in other cases; and ZocDoc needs only to produce faxes which are copies of the faxes sent to plaintiff, regardless of their address. That does not include the James L. Orrington II, DDS, PC fax. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/7/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
126
RULINGS ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCLOSURES with respect to 110 Letter Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference; with respect to 111 Letter Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference: A. Defendant Zocdoc's Motion to Compel Disclosure of the Terms o f Plaintiffs Attorneys' Retention: Under the circumstances, disclosure of the documents articulating the attorney-client relationship is justified as part of the class-certification process. B. Plaintiff Geismann's Motion to Compel Produ ction of ZocDoc's Fax Advertisements: For the reasons discussed at length at the December 3, 2019 conference (and bearing in mind that the present issue is class discovery, not discovery on the merits) defendants must produce all copies of the faxes attached to the plaintiffs complaint which were received in the two broadcasts sent to Geismann, each recipient being designated by a particular letter or numeral, regardless of their location. C. Geismann's Request for Transmission Logs: This request is denied without prejudice to renewal after seeking enforcement of her subpoena in Intellicomm's own jurisdiction. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 3/6/2020) (ml)
|
|
Filing
73
OPINION & ORDER: ZocDoc's motion (Dkt. No. 69) for leave to deposit $13,900.00 with the Clerk of Court, to be held with the $6,100.00 already deposited, payable to the plaintiff to secure a $20,000.00 judgment in favor of plaintiff, with a satisfactory form of consent to the entry of an injunction, and thereafter to follow the procedures for filing a motion for summary judgment, is granted. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 7/28/2017) (ap)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to transfer case to the Southern District of New York [# 11 ] is granted. Defendant's combined motions to dismiss or stay [# 11 ], as well as its motion to strike class allegations [# 13 ], are denied as moot, without prejudice, to be reraised if appropriate. Plaintiff's motions to certify class [# 5 ] and for leave to file surreply in opposition to defendant's motion to strike [# 29 ] are also denied as moot, without prejudice, to be reraised if appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on August 26, 2014. (BRP) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 8/28/2014.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
