Myers Industries, Inc. et al v. Schoeller Arca Systems, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Myers Industries, Inc. and Buckhorn, Inc.
Defendant: Schoeller Arca Systems, Inc. and Schoeller Arca Systems N.V.
Case Number: 1:2014cv07051
Filed: August 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: John F. Keenan
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 35 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Schoeller Arca Systems, Inc., Schoeller Arca Systems N.V.: For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs' FAC is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs' causes of action for fraudulent inducement, breach of the patent license agreement, breach of the asset purchase agreement, breach of guaranty, and unjust enrichment. The Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to the Plaintiffs' cause of action for declaratory judgment. Ordinarily, dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) is without prejudice. The Court finds, however, that amendment of the fraudulent inducement, breach of the patent license agreement, and breach of the asset purchase agreement claims would be futile because these claims are time-barred. The Court also finds that amendment of the unjust enrichment and breach of guaranty claims would be futile because these claims are su bstantively defective. Accordingly, these causes of action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. See Van Buskirk v. N.Y. Times Co., 325 F. 3d 87, 92 (2d Cir. 2003); Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). Counsel are directed to appear in Courtr oom 20-C on Thursday, April 21, 2016, at 11:15 a.m. for a conference to discuss the case management plan and scheduling order and specifically, whether the Court should order a speedy hearing of the declaratory judgment action in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 57. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 3/21/2016) (tn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Myers Industries, Inc. et al v. Schoeller Arca Systems, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Myers Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Melech Meier
Represented By: Judy L. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Buckhorn, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Melech Meier
Represented By: Judy L. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schoeller Arca Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schoeller Arca Systems N.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?