Worldwide Directories, S.A. De C.V. et al v. Yahoo! Inc. et al
Worldwide Directories, S.A. De C.V. and Ideas Interactivas, S.A. De C.V |
Yahoo! Inc., Yahoo De Mexico, S.A. De C.V., Baker & McKenzie and Baker & Mckenzie, S.C. |
1:2014cv07349 |
September 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of U.S. |
Alison J. Nathan |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 59 Motion to Dismiss; granting 64 Motion to Dismiss. The motions to dismiss the amended complaint are granted. The RICO claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c) is dismissed against all Defendants for failure to plausi bly allege (1) any RICO predicate acts committed by any Defendant, and (2) continuity. The RICO claim against the Yahoo Defendants is dismissed on the alternative ground that it fails to plausibly allege that they conducted the affairs of a RICO e nterprise. The RICO conspiracy claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) is dismissed because the complaint fails to plausibly allege that any substantive violation of RICO occurred. The state law claims are dismissed because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over them. Leave to replead is denied. This resolves Dkt. Nos. 59 and 64. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (As further set forth in this order) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/31/2016) (lmb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.