North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC et al
| North Jersey Media Group Inc. |
| Fox News Network, LLC and John Does Nos. 1 - 5 |
| 1:2014cv07630 |
| September 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons herein, Fox News' objections are DENIED and the Order is AFFIRMED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/23/2015) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER re: 44 MOTION to Sever Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims filed by News Distribution Network, Inc., 74 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument on Third-Party Defendants' Severance Motion addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from David S. Korzenik dated November 3, 2015 filed by The Daily Caller, Inc. Accordingly, the Court finds that all five factors favor severing the Video Counterclaims and the Indemnification Claims from the Photo Clai ms. For the foregoing reasons, Third Party Defendants' motion to sever is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 44 and 74. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/20/2015) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
