R.G. v. Federated, Inc. et al
| R.G. |
| Federated, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., Macy's Inc., Macy's East, Inc. and Thyssenkrupp Elevator Company |
| 1:2014cv07734 |
| September 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons above, the Court approves the settlement as submitted, except it reduces Plaintiff's counsel's attorneys' fees by 5%, from $120,892.11 to $114,847.50. The difference between these a mounts ($6,044.61) shall be allocated to S.G. as provided in a separately docketed settlement authorization order. Because the settlement resolves Plaintiff's claims, and because the Court is in receipt of a letter from Defendants in forming the Court that they have settled the cross claims in this action (Doc. No. 55), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this case is dismissed with prejudice but without costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the se ttlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 5/26/2016) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
