Pabon et al v. Barclays Bank PLC et al
Alex Pabon, Jay Merchant and Ryan Reich |
Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays Capital, Inc. |
1:2014cv07897 |
September 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Lewis A. Kaplan |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Plaintiffs move to compel defendants to produce documents that Barclays previously produced to regulators in what the parties have termed the Global Investigation, which related to fixing and manipulation of the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), for 21 custodians for the period beginning January 1, 2005 and ending May 31, 2009 (the "Previously Produced Documents"). They seek also an order requiring Barclays to furnish lists of Barcl ays employees who were (1) interviewed by regulators in connection with LIBOR or (2) criminally charged (whether or not for LIBOR-related offences), in each case for whom Barclays has paid legal fees ("ILA Funding"). Barclays resists . But it is useful before proceeding to the details to understand the basic determinants of the parties' positions. I have considered all of Barclays' arguments. Plaintiffs' letter motion [DI 46] of March 21, 2016 is granted in all respects. (As further set forth in this Memorandum Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 5/12/2016) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.