Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi v. Millennial Media, Inc. et al
| Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi |
| Millennial Media, Inc., Paul J. Palmieri, Michael B. Avon, Andrew J. Jeanneret, Michael Barrett, Robert P. Goodman, Arun Gupta, Patrick J. Kerins, Alan Macintosh, John D. Markley, Wenda H. Millard, James A. Tholen, George Zachary, Bessemer Venture Partners, Columbia Capital, Charles River Ventures, New Enterprise Associates, Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. L.L.C., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Barclays Capital Inc., Allen & Company L.L.C., Stifel, Nicolaus & Company Incorporated, Canaccord Genuity Inc. and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. |
| 1:2014cv07923 |
| September 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
OPINION AND ORDER. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions, and, in light of plaintiffs' voluntary dismissal of this case without prejudice, to close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 5/29/2015) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION & ORDER re: (27 in 1:14-cv-07923-PAE) MOTION to Appoint CHU-YING TOU AND JIEN-NING KANG to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . filed by Jien-Ning Kang, (30 in 1:14-cv-07923-PAE, 30 in 1:14-cv-07923-PAE, 30 in 1:14-cv-07923-PAE) MOTI ON to Consolidate Cases 1:14-cv-07923, 1:14-cv-08330 . MOTION to Appoint Marvin Christensen and Michelle Dayan to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . MOTION to Appoint Counsel . filed by Marvin Christensen, Michelle Dayan, (24 in 1:14-cv-07923-PAE) MOTION to Appoint Bernard T. Selz 2008 15-Year Charitable Lead Annuity Trust to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . filed by Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi, (5 in 1:14-cv-08330-PAE) MOTION to Appoint CHU-YING TOU AND JIEN-NING KANG to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . filed by Jien-Ning Kang, (31 in 1:14-cv-07923-PAE) MOTION to Appoint Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . filed by Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi. To summarize, these two cases (14 Civ. 7923 and 14 Civ. 8330) are now consolidated for all purposes, and shall proceed under the name, In re Millennial Media, Inc. Securities Litigation, and und er the case number, 14 Civ. 7923. Mississippi and the Selz Funds' motion seeking appointment as co-lead plaintiffs is granted. Christensen's, Kang's, and Ostroviak's respective bids to serve as lead plaintiff are denied. The Cou rt appoints Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP, Labaton Sucharow LLP, and Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP as co- lead counsel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at 14 Civ. 7923, Dkt. 24, 27, 30, 31; and 14 C iv. 8330, Dkt. 5. In light of the consolidation, the Clerk of Court is also directed to close the Ostroviak case, 14 Civ. 8330. Per the parties' joint letter, see Dkt. 36, the parties are directed to submit to the Court, by February 17, 2015, a proposed, and expeditious, schedule for (1) the filing of a consolidated complaint; (2) the filing of defendants' response; and (3) in the expectation that that response may take the form of a motion to dismiss, the filing of opposition and reply briefs. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 2/10/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-07923-PAE, 1:14-cv-08330-PAE(lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
