Tabatznik v. Turner

Tabatznik v. Turner

Plaintiff:	Anthony Tabatznik
Defendant:	Andrew Turner
Case Number:	1:2014cv08135
Filed:	October 9, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	John F. Keenan
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 30, 2017	Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER #107015 re: 68 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Andrew Turner. Accordingly, the Defendant's motion for reconsideration is denied. Plaintiff is directed to, within 10 days of the date of this Order, electronically file an updated calculation of interest due under the promissory note. (As further set forth in this Memorandum Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 1/30/2017) (mro) Modified on 1/31/2017 (jwh).
March 30, 2016	Filing 64 OPINION & ORDER re: 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Anthony Tabatznik, 20 MOTION for Attorney Fees , Interest and Costs filed by Anthony Tabatznik: As set forth above, Mr. Tabatznik's motion for summa ry judgment is granted and his motion for interest, fees, and costs is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close both motions (ECF Nos. 18 & 20). Mr. Tabatznik is instructed to electronically file an updated interest calculation with the Court within 10 days of the date of this Order. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 3/30/2016) (tn)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 30, 2017

Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER #107015 re: 68 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Andrew Turner. Accordingly, the Defendant's motion for reconsideration is denied. Plaintiff is directed to, within 10 days of the date of this Order, electronically file an updated calculation of interest due under the promissory note. (As further set forth in this Memorandum Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 1/30/2017) (mro) Modified on 1/31/2017 (jwh).

March 30, 2016

Filing 64 OPINION & ORDER re: 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Anthony Tabatznik, 20 MOTION for Attorney Fees , Interest and Costs filed by Anthony Tabatznik: As set forth above, Mr. Tabatznik's motion for summa ry judgment is granted and his motion for interest, fees, and costs is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close both motions (ECF Nos. 18 & 20). Mr. Tabatznik is instructed to electronically file an updated interest calculation with the Court within 10 days of the date of this Order. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 3/30/2016) (tn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tabatznik v. Turner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Tabatznik
Represented By:	Kimberly Perrotta Cole
Represented By:	Danielle Lauren Rose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Turner
Represented By:	Victoria Pauline Lane
Represented By:	Nathan Rodney Sabourin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?