Mohamed v. NYU et al
Hassan S. Mohamed |
NYU, Alison Larry, John Bradley, Jim Murihm and Michel Modeca |
1:2014cv08373 |
October 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Queens |
George B. Daniels |
Michael H. Dolinger |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 OPINION re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint, filed by Jim Murihm, NYU, John Bradley, Alison Larry, Michel Modeca. Magistrate Judge Dolinger's Report is adopted in full. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The u ntimely (1) failure to promote claims under Title VII, the ADEA, and the NYSHRL; (2) unequal terms and conditions of employment claims under Title VII and the ADEA; and (3) the unequal terms and conditions of employment claim under the NYSHRL for the period between January 2011 through April 2011 are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Title VII and the ADEA claims against the individual defendants are also DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs remaining federal, state, and city claims are DISMISSED wi thout prejudice to rep leading. Plaintiff may file a letter application with this Court within sixty (60) days of this Opinion, attaching a proposed Amended Complaint and requesting leave to amend the following claims. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion at ECF No. 12. (As is further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 9/10/2015) (spo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.