Misas et al v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System et al
| Eliana Misas and Rhonda McIntosh |
| North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System and Julio Cardoza |
| 1:2014cv08787 |
| November 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Andrew L. Carter |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
OPINION AND ORDER re: 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Julio Cardoza. For all of the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' Title VII and NYCHRL sexual harassment claims is denied, but is granted as to the Hospital on Plaintiffs' NYSHRL claim for sexual harassment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Misas' retaliation claims is granted as it relates to her termination, but not any earlier suspensions. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Mcintosh's retaliation claims is granted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' remaining common law claims is denied as moot given Plaintiffs' withdrawal of those causes of action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 4/27/2017) (anc)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER: Based on the foregoing, Defendants' objections to the May 20, 2016 Electronic Order are overruled. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/25/2016) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
