Hughes v. Lebron et al
| Walter Hughes |
| Julio Lebron, Kevin Gunther and David Gomez |
| 1:2014cv09479 |
| December 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
OPINION & ORDER re: 58 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by Julio Lebron. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Lebron's motion for partial summary judgment as to Hughes's false arrest claim. Hughes may p roceed to trial against Lebron on his excessive force claim. The Court directs counsel to meet and confer in person within three weeks of this decision to attempt to resolve this case. In the event a settlement is not reached, a joint pre trial order, motions in limine, proposed voir dire questions, and requests to charge will be due on October 31, 2016. Oppositions to any motions in limine will be due November 7, 2016. After the Court reviews the parties' submissions, the Court's staff will contact counsel to schedule a trial date. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 58. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Motions due by 10/31/2016., Pretrial Order due by 10/31/2016., Responses due by 11/7/2016) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/19/2016) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
