Montefiore Medical Center v. Local 272 Welfare Fund et al
Plaintiff: Montefiore Medical Center
Defendant: Local 272 Welfare Fund and Marc Goodman
Case Number: 1:2014cv10229
Filed: December 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Bronx
Presiding Judge: Lewis A. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 73 OPINION & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATIONS for 68 Report and Recommendations 48 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Marc Goodman, Local 272 Welfare Fund, 43 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Montefiore Medical Center . The parties cross-moved for summary judgment. The motions were referred to Magistrate Judge Netburn, and on December 2, 2016, she issued a Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), which recommends that Montefiore's Motion for Summ ary Judgment be granted and the Fund's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. On December 16, 2016, the Fund filed objections to the Report, and on December 30, 2016, Montefiore filed its response. For the reasons that follow, the Court adopt s the thorough and well-reasoned Report in its entirety. (As further set forth in this Order.) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. This case is remanded to the Fund so t hat it can reconsider Montefiore's claims, consistent with this Opinion and the Report and Recommendation, which is adopted in full, within the time constrains set forth in the Plan. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions pending at docket numbers 43 and 48. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/31/2017) (cf)
December 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION for 28 Report and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed the Report and found no clear error. Accordingly, Plaintiff's second cause of action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. As Judge Netb um warned, the parties' failure to file timely objections to the Report has waived those objections for the purposes of appeal. See United States v. Male Juvenile, 121F.3d34, 38 (2d Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the open entry at docket number 11. SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 12/4/2015) (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montefiore Medical Center v. Local 272 Welfare Fund et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Montefiore Medical Center
Represented By: John Gregory Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Local 272 Welfare Fund
Represented By: Danya Ahmed
Represented By: Jane Lauer Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marc Goodman
Represented By: Danya Ahmed
Represented By: Jane Lauer Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?