v. Citigroup Inc,
Respondent: Citigroup Inc,
Applicant: Dr Heleen Mees
Case Number: 1:2014mc00056
Filed: March 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Part One
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: The Court's October 29, 2021 Order directed the parties to submit a joint status letter within 30 days of a final decision on the motion to renew and/or vacate the Kings County Judgment. ECF No. 33. The Order also directed the parties to file a joint status letter no later than October 13, 2021, advising the Court whether Mees v. Citigroup, Inc., 15-mc-00262 can be closed on consent of the parties. After over two years, the Court has not received any filings.The parties are directed to file a joint status letter by December 5, 2023. Should the parties fail to comply with this Order, the Court will close these matters pursuant to Rule 41(b). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 11/3/2023) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-mc-00056-LAP, 1:14-mc-00088-LAP, 1:15-mc-00262-LAP (dsh)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER: On September 28, 2021, the parties submitted a status letter pursuant to the Court's October 22, 2020 Order. Upon consideration of the parties' letter, these actions REMAIN STAYED. The parties are directed to file a status letter within 30 days of a final decision on the motion to renew and/or vacate the Kings County Judgment. The parties are also directed to meet and confer as to whether Mees v. Citigroup, Inc., 15-mc-00262, can be closed on consent of the parties, and to file a letter on the public docket advising the Court of their positions on this issue no later than October 13, 2021. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 9/29/2021) (ras) (Main Document 63 replaced on 9/29/2021) (ras).
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER: The Court has reviewed the letter submissions from Dr. Mees and Mr. Buiter regarding Magistrate Judge Netburn's October 22, 2020 Order. Dr. Mees shall file any reply in further support of her letter submission no later than October 30, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/28/2020) (va)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: On October 22, 2020, the Court held a telephonic conference to discuss the outstanding issues in these cases and determine the appropriate action. Upon consideration of the parties' arguments, these actions REMAIN STAYED.The parties are directed to file a status letter within 14 days of a final decision from the New York courts pertaining to the matters at issue in these cases. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/22/2020) (ama)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER: Accordingly, EACH PARTY is directed to submit a proposal to the Court specifying what is outstanding in each case and what action is required to complete it. These proposals shall be submitted no later than October 20, 2020. A telephonic c onference is scheduled on October 22, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. in which to address these proposals and set a schedule for moving these matters forward. At that time the parties should call into the Court's designated teleconferencing line at (80 0) 402-9757 and enter access code 7938632 follow by the pound (#) key.s. So Ordered. (Telephone Conference set for 10/22/2020 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/13/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-mc-00056-LAP, 1:14-mc-00088-LAP, 1:15-mc-00262-LAP (js)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: v. Citigroup Inc,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Applicant: Dr Heleen Mees
Represented By: Olav A. Haazen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Citigroup Inc,
Represented By: Cora Elizabeth Maclean
Represented By: John Michael Riordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?