In Re:Application of Hornbeam Corporation
Case Number: 1:2014mc00424
Filed: December 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Part One
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 228 OPINION AND ORDER re: 196 MOTION to Intervene MOTION to Unseal Judicial Documents. filed by Buzzfeed, Inc., 216 MOTION for Sanctions , Discovery And Attorneys Fees. filed by Panikos Symeou. For the foregoing reasons , it is ORDERED that Symeou's motion is DENIED, Buzzfeed's motion to intervene is GRANTED, and its motion to unseal is GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to file publicly documents 48 and 126 in their entirety. It is further ORDERED that by January 28, 2022, Hornbeam shall file with me versions of the Declarations with more specific and targeted redactions than those found in the currently-public versions of these documents. Along with those redacted versions of the Declarations, Hornbeam shall file a letter motion explaining the basis for each sentence and clause it seeks to redact. Unless the basis for redaction is obvious, Hornbeam must cite to specific law on point. For example, if it seeks to maintai n redactions on portions of the Withdrawal Declaration that do not fall within the scope of an attorney-client communication, it would need to cite clear law regarding why such redactions are proper. Similarly, if Hornbeam seeks to maintain redaction s on the portions of the Declarations discussing Ms. Elder's conversations with DOJ attorneys, it would need to cite clear law to support that as well. If Hornbeam fails to comply with these terms by the aforementioned date, or if I find after r eviewing Hornbeam's explanations that there is not good basis for any of the redactions that Hornbeam proposes, I will publicly file versions of the Declarations with only the redactions I believe necessary. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 1/28/2022.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/6/2022) (kv) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing.
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 210 OPINION & ORDER re: 195 LETTER MOTION for Discovery in Response to Doc. 194 addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Tucker H. Byrd, Esq. dated 04/17/2020. filed by Application of Hornbeam Corporation, 157 LETTER MOTION to Compel Hornbeam Corp. to Disclose, Destroy and Certify addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Bruce S. Marks dated 08-09-2019 filed by Panikos Symeou, 187 MOTION to Amend/Correct Second Amended Protective Order filed by Application of Hornbeam Corporation, 186 MOTION to Amend/Correct 106 Protective Order filed by Application of Hornbeam Corporation. For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby: ORDERED that Intervenor Panikos Symeou's le tter motion to compel, (Doc. 157), is GRANTED, and Applicant Hornbeam Corporation's motion to amend the Second Amended Protective Order, (Docs. 186, 187), is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with paragraph 15(c) and (d) of the SAPO, Applicant shall destroy the Responsive Materials within fourteen (14) days, and certify such destruction to counsel for Symeou; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with the representation in the Declaration of Bruce S. Marks, (Doc. 191), t he Responsive Materials shall be preserved by counsel for Symeou for potential discovery in the Delaware Action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motions at Documents 157, 186, 187, and 195. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/13/2020) (rro)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 185 OPINION & ORDER re: 180 MOTION to Compel Production And Unseal The September 23, 2019 Carol Bruce And Michael Rella Ex Parte Declarations And Certifications. filed by Panikos Symeou, 155 MOTION for Carol Elder Bruce, Alexand ra J. Marinzel, Robertson T. Park, Michael V. Rella, James K. Goldfarb, Sharon Anne O'Shaughnessy, and Murphy & McGonigle, P.C. to Withdraw as Attorney of Record for Hornbeam Corporation in This Proceedin filed by Application of Hornbeam Co rporation., For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby: ORDERED that Murphy & McGonigle's motion to withdraw as attorney of record for Hornbeam Corporation, (Doc. 155), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Intervenor Panikos Symeou's mo tion to compel, (Doc. 180), is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, considering the parties' joint status update, (Doc. 181), the Court will not postpone ruling on Intervenor Panikos Symeou's letter motion to compel, (Doc. 157), until res olution of the Florida Litigation. Accordingly, the parties must advise the Court within fourteen (14) days of this order of any additional information the Court should consider in deciding whether good cause exists for modifying the SAPO, or whet her Symeou's requested reliefwinding up these proceedings in accordance with SAPO Sections 15(c) and (d)is appropriate. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motions at Documents 155 and 180. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/13/2019) Attorney Michael V. Rella; James K. Goldfarb and Sharon Anne O'Shaughnessy terminated. (ks)
August 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 140 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 113 MOTION to Intervene and. MOTION to Amend/Correct the Court's Protective Order to Permit the use of Discovery. filed by Application of Hornbeam Corporation. For the foregoing reasons, the Applicants' motion for an order permitting Shulman to intervene and to amend the Second Amended Protective Order is denied without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/14/2017) (rj)
July 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 132 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION (Part 1) re: 124 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 112 Memorandum & Opinion, . filed by Panikos Symeou. As such, Symeou's letter motion that I restore the previous deadline set forth destruction of discovery materials, and thereafter order the destruction of those materials, is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/7/2017) (rj)
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 112 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 88 MOTION to Stay PENDING APPEAL. (Filing Fee $ 46.00.) filed by Panikos Symeou. After balancing these factors, I find that Symeou has not justified the imposition of a stay pending appeal. Accordingly, Symeou's motion for a stay is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate the open motion at Document 88. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 5/22/2017) (rj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re:Application of Hornbeam Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?