Steinberg v. Elkman et al
Jonathan Steinberg |
Stephen M. Elkman, Alan Gerst, Robert E. Michael and Andrew A. Cuomo |
1:2015cv00278 |
January 14, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, filed by Andrew A. Cuomo, 29 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment in Favor of Alan Gerst, Robert E . Michael and the Estate of Steven M. Elkman, filed by Stephen M. Elkman, Alan Gerst, Robert E. Michael. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint are granted. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves Docket Entry Numbers 20 and 29. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction and close this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Memoran dum Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 2/22/2016) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (spo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.