Gonzalez v. Hirschman et al
| Christina Gonzalez |
| Mark Hirschman, Vargas and Peter Dauria |
| 1:2015cv00810 |
| February 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Vargas, Mark Hirschman, Peter Dauria. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/31/2017) (anc)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 16 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, In Part. filed by Vargas, Mark Hirschman, Peter Dauria. For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in p art. All of Ms. Gonzalez's claims arising from the events of February 1, 2012 survive the motion to dismiss. Ms. Gonzalez's excessive force claims arising from the events of April 10, 2012 and July 12, 2012 are dismissed. Ms. Gonzalez' s claims against Captain Vargas arising from the events of July 12, 2012 survive the motion to dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket 16. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/28/2016) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
