Decastro v. Norrell Corporation

Decastro v. Norrell Corporation

Plaintiff:	Gregory Decastro
Defendant:	Norrell Corporation
Case Number:	1:2015cv00944
Filed:	February 6, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 8, 2019	Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motions pending at Docket Numbers 44 & 46 and close this case. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/8/2019) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
January 9, 2018	Filing 32 OPINION AN ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct 2 Complaint filed by Gregory Decastro. For the reasons explained above, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend. In light of Decastro's prose status, the Court exe rcises its discretion to do so without prejudice. If Decastro seeks to proceed with this action, he may file a renewed motion for leave to amend. Decastro must attach to his motion a proposed amended complaint that alleges facts sufficient to esta blish all the elements of his ADA and/or race-discrimination claims as explained above. See Davis, 804 F.3d at 235. The amended complaint must incorporate all of his proposed amendments, including any proposed changes to factual allegations, legal claims, and Defendant's identity. If Plaintiff chooses to file a motion for leave to amend and a proposed amended complaint, he must do so by February 9, 2018. The failure to file such a motion (along with the attached proposed amended complai nt) by that date will result in the dismissal of the case with prejudice. Plaintiff is once again advised that a legal clinic has opened in this District to assist people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The Clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group; it is not part of, or run by, the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any unrepresented party throug h the Pro Se Intake Unit). Enclosed is an information sheet with further information regarding the Clinic. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Docket No. 30. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Amended Pleadings due by 2/9/2018., Motions due by 2/9/2018.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/9/2018) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 8, 2019

Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motions pending at Docket Numbers 44 & 46 and close this case. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/8/2019) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

January 9, 2018

Filing 32 OPINION AN ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct 2 Complaint filed by Gregory Decastro. For the reasons explained above, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend. In light of Decastro's prose status, the Court exe rcises its discretion to do so without prejudice. If Decastro seeks to proceed with this action, he may file a renewed motion for leave to amend. Decastro must attach to his motion a proposed amended complaint that alleges facts sufficient to esta blish all the elements of his ADA and/or race-discrimination claims as explained above. See Davis, 804 F.3d at 235. The amended complaint must incorporate all of his proposed amendments, including any proposed changes to factual allegations, legal claims, and Defendant's identity. If Plaintiff chooses to file a motion for leave to amend and a proposed amended complaint, he must do so by February 9, 2018. The failure to file such a motion (along with the attached proposed amended complai nt) by that date will result in the dismissal of the case with prejudice. Plaintiff is once again advised that a legal clinic has opened in this District to assist people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The Clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group; it is not part of, or run by, the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any unrepresented party throug h the Pro Se Intake Unit). Enclosed is an information sheet with further information regarding the Clinic. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Docket No. 30. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Amended Pleadings due by 2/9/2018., Motions due by 2/9/2018.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/9/2018) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Decastro v. Norrell Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Decastro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Norrell Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?