Fisher et al v. Tice
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Fisher and Wendy H. Krivit
Defendant: Cynthia Tice
Case Number: 1:2015cv00955
Filed: February 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Debra C. Freeman
Presiding Judge: Lewis A. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER (Corrected) adopting 71 Report and Recommendations, granting 40 Motion to Dismiss, denying 58 Motion for Sanctions. Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to both plaintiffs and for Rule 11 sanctions. In a thorough report and recommendation dated July 5, 2016, Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman has recommended that the motion for summary judgment be granted in all respects and that the motion for sanctions be denied. Plaintiffs object to the recommend ation with respect to the motion for summary judgment. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions and the report and recommendation with care. It finds no error of fact or law. Among other things, it shares the magistrate judge's vi ew that an agreement to share both profits and losses is an essential element of a joint venture under the law of New York. E.g., SCS Communications, Inc. v. Herrick Co., Inc., 360 F.3d 329, 341 (2d Cir. 2004) (applying New York law); Itel Containe rs Int'l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Express Serv. Ltd., 909 F.2d 698, 701 (2d Cir. 1990) (applying New York law); Int'l Equity Investments, Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd., 472 F. Supp.2d 544, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (applying New York law). Accordingly, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint [DI 40] is granted, substantially for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation and, in addition, defendant's response to plaintiffs' o bjections to the report and recommendation. Her motion for sanctions [DI 58] is denied, substantially for the reasons given by Magistrate Judge Freeman. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/4/2016 and corrected on 9/7/2016) (mro)
September 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER re: 71 Report and Recommendations; re: 58 Motion for Sanctions filed by Cynthia Tice and 40 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Cynthia Tice. Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to both defendant s and for Rule 11 sanctions. In a thorough report and recommendation dated July 5, 2016, Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman has recommended that the motion for summary judgment be granted in all respects and that the motion for sanctions be den ied. Plaintiffs object to the recommendation with respect to the motion for summary judgment. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions and the report and recommendation with care. It finds no error of fact or law. Accordi ngly, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint [DI 40] is granted, substantially for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation and, in addition, defendant's response to plaintiffs' objecti ons to the report and recommendation. Her motion for sanctions [DI 58] is denied, substantially for the reasons given by Magistrate Judge Freeman. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/4/2016) (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fisher et al v. Tice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Fisher
Represented By: William Irvin Dunnegan
Represented By: Laura Jean Scileppi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendy H. Krivit
Represented By: William Irvin Dunnegan
Represented By: Laura Jean Scileppi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cynthia Tice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?