Carigan v. Breitling USA, Inc.
Frederick M. Carigan |
Breitling USA, Inc. |
1:2015cv01084 |
February 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
George B. Daniels |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 90 Order on Motion to Reopen, in favor of Breitling USA, Inc. against Frederick M. Cargian. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated September 13, 2021, Defendant's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 84) is granted; accordingly, this case is closed (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 9/15/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt) |
Filing 89 ORDER: Co-counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the conference by calling (917) 933-2166 and entering the code ID 214525382. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Telephone Conference set for 2/24/2021 at 09:30 AM before Judge George B. Daniels.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 2/18/2021) (jca) |
Filing 88 ORDER: The status conference scheduled for February 3, 2021 is canceled. Oral argument on Defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 84), is scheduled for February 24, 2021 at 10:30 am. (Oral Argument set for 2/24/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge George B. Daniels.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/7/2021) (jwh) |
Filing 82 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to remove the above-captioned action from the suspense docket and place it on the active docket. The status conference scheduled for October 14, 2020 is adjourned to February 3, 2021 at 9:45 am. Defendant may renew its motion for summary judgment and supplement its prior submissions by letter addressing why summary judgment is warranted under the Supreme Court's recent decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020), and pr ior summary judgment precedence. Defendant's letter submission shall be due by November 9, 2020. Plaintiff's letter opposition shall be filed by December 9, 2020 and Defendant's letter reply, if any, shall be submitted by December 23, 2020. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 10/8/2020) (jwh) |
Filing 81 ORDER: A conference scheduled for October 14, 2020 at 9:45 a.m. (Status Conference set for 10/14/2020 at 09:45 AM before Judge George B. Daniels.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 7/14/2020) (jwh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carigan v. Breitling USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frederick M. Carigan | |
Represented By: | Janice Goodman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Breitling USA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Glenn Sklaire Grindlinger |
Represented By: | Zev Samuel Singer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.