The Fairbanks Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al
| The Fairbanks Company |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, AXA Royale Belge, The Hartford Insurance Company and Traveler's Casualty & Surety Company |
| AXA Royale Belge |
| The Fairbanks Company |
| 1:2015cv01141 |
| February 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
225
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, Liberty's motion for the Court to certify the August 5 Order for interlocutory appeal is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 167 (in case no. 13cv3755). SO ORDERED. re: 220 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability re: the Court's August 5, 2016 Memorandum Opinion and Order for Interlocutory Appeal filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/22/2016) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
216
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the parties' arguments are either moot or without merit. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all pend ing motions. The parties should file a joint letter informing the Court of the results of their September mediation before Justice Freedman. SO ORDERED. re: 202 MOTION for Summary Judgment For Declaratory Relief as to the Non-Cumulation Clauses filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 198 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by The Fairbanks Company. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 8/5/2016) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
179
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the parties' arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, Liberty's motion for summar y judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Fairbanks' motion for summary judgment against Liberty is denied. Fairbanks' motion for summary judgment against AXA is denied without prejudice. Fairbanks' motion for summary judgment against certain insurers is denied. National Union's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Fireman's Fund's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all pending motions. re: 109 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the Initial Issues Against Certain Defendants filed by The Fairbanks Company, 105 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company on th e Initial Issues. filed by The Fairbanks Company, 176 MOTION for Richard A. Ejzak to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12043501 filed by The Fairbanks Company, 163 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from David F. Russey dated October 19, 2015 filed by The Fairbanks Company, 113 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Defendant AXA Royale Belge on the Initial Issues filed by The Fairbanks Company. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/21/2016) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
