BOKF, N.A. v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation
Plaintiff: BOKF, N.A.
Defendant: Caesars Entertainment Corporation
Case Number: 1:2015cv01561
Filed: March 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Shira A. Scheindlin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close these motions (Docket No. 60 in 15-cv-1561 and Docket No. 66 in 15-cv-4634). (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/5/2016) (kl)
August 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER re: (37 in 1:15-cv-04634-SAS) LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Jonathan H. Hurwitz dated July 17, 2015. filed by Caesars Entertainment Corporation, (27 in 1:15- cv-04634-SAS) MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . filed by UMB Bank, N.A., (35 in 1:15-cv-04634-SAS) LETTER MOTION for Local Rule 37.2 Conference Requesting a Pre-Motion Conference and Permission to File a Motion to Quash and/or for a Protective Order addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Natan M. Hamerman dated July 13, 2015. filed by Brigade Capital Management, LP, Elliot Management Corporation, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., Franklin Advisers , Inc., Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, (30 in 1:15-cv-01561-SAS) MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . filed by BOKF, N.A., (35 in 1:15-cv-01561-SAS) LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages addressed to J udge Shira A. Scheindlin from Jonathan H. Hurwitz dated July 17, 2015. filed by Caesars Entertainment Corporation. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. I hereby certify an interlocutory appeal from this Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to close these motions (Docket Nos. 30, 35 in 15-cv-1561; Docket Nos. 27, 35, 37 in 15-cv-4634). A conference is scheduled for October 7, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. SO ORDERED. (As further set forth within this Opinion.) (Status Conference set for 10/7/2015 at 03:30 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/27/2015) (ajs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOKF, N.A. v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caesars Entertainment Corporation
Represented By: Philippe Adler
Represented By: Lewis Richard Clayton
Represented By: Michael E. Gertzman
Represented By: Jonathan Hillel Hurwitz
Represented By: Jason Charles Rubinstein
Represented By: Eric Jonathan Seiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BOKF, N.A.
Represented By: Michael S. Cryan
Represented By: Mark Brent Joachim
Represented By: Andrew I. Silfen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?