Crye Precision, LLC et al v. Duro Textiles, LLC
Plaintiff: Crye Precision, LLC and Lineweight LLC
Defendant: Duro Textiles, LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv01681
Filed: March 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 113 OPINION & ORDER....Duros October 23, 2015 motion for summary judgment is granted. Cryes remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/22/2016) (gr)
October 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 82 OPINION & ORDER: This action arises from a continuing dispute between the licensor and owner of a patented camouflage pattern, plaintiffs Crye Precision LLC (Crye Precision) and Lineweight LLC (Lineweight) (collectively Crye), and a former licensee, defendant Duro Textiles, LLC (Duro). On July 23, 2015, Crye moved to dismiss all twelve counterclaims asserted by Duro pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, Cryes motion is granted.... (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/28/2015) (gr)
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION & ORDER...Cryes April 3 motion is granted. Duros April 24 motion is granted in part: Cryes Fourth Cause of Action, for unjust enrichment, is dismissed. Duros First through Fourth Counterclaims, seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringem ent, remain, so the Court continues to have jurisdiction over the action, as discussed above. If either side desires to amend its pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), it must do so by June 24. No further opportunity to amend will be grant ed. And, as noted above, by June 24, Crye and Duro shall each submit a two-page letter addressing whether Cryes Second and Third Causes of Action should be remanded for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/16/2015) (gr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crye Precision, LLC et al v. Duro Textiles, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crye Precision, LLC
Represented By: Lauren Beth Grassotti
Represented By: Robert Allen Horowitz
Represented By: Justin Albano MacLean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lineweight LLC
Represented By: Lauren Beth Grassotti
Represented By: Robert Allen Horowitz
Represented By: Justin Albano MacLean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duro Textiles, LLC
Represented By: Celia Goldwag Barenholtz
Represented By: Erin Murray Estevez
Represented By: Jonathan Garwood Graves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?