Araman v. Best Buy et al
Plaintiff: Araman and Christine Araman
Defendant: Best Buy, BDS Marketing, NYS Department of Labor and Mikes Bistro
Case Number: 1:2015cv02198
Filed: March 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Loretta A Preska
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2015 Mailed notice of Right to Appeal re: #8 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #7 Order, to Christine Araman 521 W. 146th Street Unit 403 New York, NY 10031. (ca)
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the orders issued May 12, 2015, and June 29, 2015, dismissing the complaint and barring Plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff is barred from filing future civil actions in forma pauperis in this Court without leave of the Court. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/29/2015) (kko) Modified on 6/30/2015 (kko).
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 BAR ORDER UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: Accordingly, Plaintiff is barred from filing future civil actions in forma pauperis in this Court without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. Any motion for leave to file must be captioned "Application Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to File." The Plaintiff must attach a copy of her proposed complaint and attach a copy of this order with each and any such motion. Should the Plaintiff violate this order and file an action without first filing a motion for leave to file, the action will be dismissed for failure to comply with this order. Plaintiff is warned that the continued submission of further frivolous documents may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. See 28 U.S.C. 1651. The Clerk is directed to close this action. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/29/2015) (kko)
June 29, 2015 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #8 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #7 Order, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (kko)
June 29, 2015 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. The transmission was incorrectly filed in this case. (kko)
June 29, 2015 Filing 6 LETTER addressed to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Christine Araman, dated 6/19/15 re: Plaintiff submits this letter to the Court in regard to family violence, and how the Ofifce of the District Attorney's influence has made this a lifelong nightmare for her. Document filed by Christine Araman.(sc)
May 19, 2015 Mailed a copy of #5 Order of Dismissal, to Christine Araman 521 W. 146th Street Unit 403 New York, NY 10031. (ca)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff shall have thirty days to show cause by written affirmation why an order should not be entered barring her from filing future civil actions in this Court in forma pauperis without leave of the Court. An Affirmation Under 28 U.S.C. 1651 form is attached to this order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 5/12/2015) (Attachments: #1 Affirmation)(tn)
May 12, 2015 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Loretta A. Preska. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (tn)
May 12, 2015 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #5 Order of Dismissal, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (tn)
May 11, 2015 Filing 4 PRO SE MEMORANDUM dated 5/11/15 re: CHANGE OF ADDRESS for Christine Araman. New Address: 521 W. 146t Street, New York, New York, 10031. (sc)
April 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/22/2015) (sbr)
April 22, 2015 Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Christine Araman at 541 W. 146th Street Unit 403 New York, NY 10031. (sbr)
March 18, 2015 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BDS Marketing, Best Buy, Mikes Bistro, NYS Department of Labor. Document filed by Christine Araman.(sac)
March 18, 2015 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Christine Araman.(sac)
March 18, 2015 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Araman v. Best Buy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Araman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Araman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Buy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BDS Marketing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYS Department of Labor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mikes Bistro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?