MFW Associates, LLC v. Plausteiner et al
Plaintiff: MFW Associates, LLC
Defendant: Steven Plausteiner and Susan Plausteiner
Case Number: 1:2015cv02513
Filed: April 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 125 OPINION & ORDER re: 89 MOTION for Attachment of Defendants' Real Property in Vermont filed by MFW Associates, LLC; 94 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Steven Plausteiner, Susan Plausteiner; 107 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MFW Associates, LLC. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Plausteiners' motion for summary judgment, on the ground that this lawsuit is precluded by res judicata. Accordingly, the MFW's m otion for summary judgment is denied, and its motion for an attachment of real property is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkts. 89, 94, and 107, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/2/2017) (anc)
April 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion for reconsideration is denied. Defendants' motion for a stay of discovery is, therefore, also denied, as moot. The deadline for the completion of all fact discovery, Aug ust 3, 2016, as set forth in the case management plan and scheduling order, Dkt. 54, remains in place. The parties should not expect any extensions of this deadline. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions pending at dockets 56 and 61. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 4/27/2016) (kl)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 OPINION & ORDER re: 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Steven Plausteiner, Susan Plausteiner. For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss is denied. The parties are directed to jointly submit a proposed case management plan and scheduling order by April 1, 2016. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion pending at docket 19. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/24/2016) (kko)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MFW Associates, LLC v. Plausteiner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MFW Associates, LLC
Represented By: John Alan Van Amburg
Represented By: Thomas Vays
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Plausteiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Plausteiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?