Purjes v. Plausteiner et al
| Dan Purjes |
| Steven Plausteiner and Susan Plausteiner |
| 1:2015cv02515 |
| April 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Valerie E. Caproni |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
OPINION & ORDER: re: 31 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Steven Plausteiner, Susan Plausteiner. Because res judicata does not bar Plaintiff's claims and because the Amended Complaint adequately states claims for breach of contract a nd fraudulent conveyance, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 31) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Docket Entry 31. The parties are directed to meet and confer on a discovery schedule and, on or before February 19 , 2016, to submit a joint letter to the Court proposing a discovery schedule. The parties must appear for a status conference on February 26, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 443 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New Yor k, 10007. The parties are reminded that, at any time, they may jointly contact Chambers to request referral to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 2/10/2016) (spo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
