Antarctica Star I, LP et al v. Gibbs International, Inc.
| Antarctica Star I, LP and Antarctica Star, LLC |
| Gibbs International, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv02630 |
| April 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION & ORDER re: 70 MOTION to Dismiss Gibbs International, Inc.'s Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint 54 . filed by Chandra Patel, Antarctica Star I, LP, Acre, LLC, Antarctica Star, LLC. This dispute arises out of a failed multi-billion dollar property transaction with the State of California. The crux of the dispute is whether Gibbs International, Inc. ("Gibbs") is entitled to, inter alia, some portion of a settlement related to this failed trans action. Ultimately, this Court finds the agreements unambiguous and not supportive of Gibbs's claims. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons set forth above, Antarctica's motion to dismiss Gibbs's amended counterclaims and third-party complaint, converted to a motion for judgment on the pleadings, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 70, 73, 79, 82, and 86. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 2/14/2017) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
