CAL DIVE OFFSHORE CONTRACTORS INC ET AL v. M/V SAMPSON ET AL
Cal Dive Offshore Contractors Inc, Cal Dive International Inc. and Gulf Offshore Contruction Inc |
m/v Sampson, Cvi Global Lux Oil And Gas 4 Sarl and CarVal Investors LLC |
1:2015cv02788 |
April 10, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
J. Paul Oetken |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not proven any of their claims by a preponderance of the evidence and Defendants are entitled to judgment on all claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment for Defendants and to close this case.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/17/2017) (ama) |
Filing 86 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Cal Dive International Inc., Gulf Offshore Contruction Inc, Cal Dive Offshore Contractors Inc, 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Cvi Global Lux Oil And Gas 4 Sarl, m/v Sampson, CarVal Investors LLC. For the reasons stated above, CarVal's motion to dismiss is DENIED; Cal Dive's motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and CVI's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 68 and 74. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/27/2017) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.