Santana v. Capra

Santana v. Capra

Petitioner:	Alexander Santana
Respondent:	Michael Capra
Case Number:	1:2015cv02818
Filed:	March 30, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Westchester
Presiding Judge:	William H. Pauley
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	18 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 6, 2018	Filing 34 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 33 Letter Motion to Reopen Case: For the foregoing reasons, Santana's counsel's application is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 33. This case remains closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 12/6/2018) (jwh)
September 12, 2017	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM & ORDER for 30 Report and Recommendations: This Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's thorough and well-reasoned Report, and finds that it is not erroneous on its face. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report in its entirety. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and mark this case as closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 9/12/2017) (jwh)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 6, 2018

Filing 34 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 33 Letter Motion to Reopen Case: For the foregoing reasons, Santana's counsel's application is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 33. This case remains closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 12/6/2018) (jwh)

September 12, 2017

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM & ORDER for 30 Report and Recommendations: This Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's thorough and well-reasoned Report, and finds that it is not erroneous on its face. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report in its entirety. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and mark this case as closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 9/12/2017) (jwh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santana v. Capra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Alexander Santana
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Capra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?