The Mercator Corporation v. Sapinda UK Limited et al
| The Mercator Corporation |
| Sapinda UK Limited and Lars Windhorst |
| 1:2015cv02970 |
| April 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 50 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. filed by Sapinda Holding B.V. The defendant's motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint is granted, and the Amended Complaint is di smissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the Second Amended Complaint and closing the case. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/10/2016) (cf)
|
|
Filing
41
OPINION AND ORDER. The defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint is granted, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 days of the issuance of this opinion. Th e Clerk is directed to close ECF Docket No. 17. So ordered. re: 17 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Oral Argument Requested filed by Sapinda Holding B.V., Lars Windhorst. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/10/2016) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
