SI Group Consort Ltd. v. Ukraine et al
SI Group Consort Ltd. |
Ukraine, Ivano-Frankivisk Regional State Administration and Department for Construction, Housing, Urban Development adn Architecture of the Ivano-Farnkivisk Regional State Administration |
1:2015cv03047 |
April 20, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Andrew L. Carter |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 28 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted. filed by Ivano-Frankivisk Regional State Administration, Ukraine, Department for Const ruction, Housing, Urban Development and Architecture of the Ivano-Farnkivisk Regional State Administration. For the foregoing reasons, no statutory exception to Defendants' sovereign immunity is applicable, and the Court accordingly lacks subjec t matter and personal jurisdiction in this case. Defendants' motions to dismiss the Complaint is therefore granted, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2). This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry no. 28. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment dismissing the Complaint for lack of jurisdiction, and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/30/2017) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.