MIC General Insurance Company v. Chambers et al
MIC General Insurance Company |
Shawn Chambers, Ferdinand Chambers, Pertie Chambers and Wanema Allen |
1:2015cv03324 |
April 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Jesse M. Furman |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 85 MOTION for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment Decision filed by MIC General Insurance Company: the Court denies MIC's motion for reconsideration in part and reserves judgment in part. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 85. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 7/18/2016) (tn) |
Filing 83 OPINION AND ORDER re: 82 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument of Wanema Allen's Motion for Summary Judgment addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Jeffrey L. Schulman dated February 12, 2016 filed by Wanema Allen, 67 MOTION f or Partial Summary Judgment filed by Wanema Allen, 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MIC General Insurance Company: For the reasons stated above, MIC's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Allen's cross-motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In particular, MIC's motion for summary judgment against Shawn is denied (without prejudice as to its duty to indemnify claim), while its motion against Ferdinand and Pertie Chambers is granted. Allen's cross-motion for summary judgment as to MIC's duty to defend Shawn is granted, but Allen's request for attorneys' fees and costs is denied. MIC shall serve a c opy of this Opinion and Order on Pertie and Ferdinand Chambers and promptly file proof of such service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 61, 67, and 82, to enter judgment against Ferdinand and Pertie Chambers, and to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Shawn Chambers. Furthermore, seeing no reason to keep this case open pending resolution of the underlying lawsuit, when the question of whether MIC has a duty to indemnify would become ripe, the Cour t directs the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case without prejudice to any party seeking to reopen it within thirty days of entry of judgment in the underlying lawsuit. To be clear, that requires any party seeking to reopen the case to make a letter motion to that effect no later than thirty days after entry of judgment in the underlying lawsuit. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/8/2016) (tn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.