Maldonado v. Shiro et al
Plaintiff: Angel Maldonado
Defendant: Dora B. Shiro, Tony Durante and City of New York
Case Number: 1:2015cv03409
Filed: April 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: James L. Cott
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 31 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by William De Blasio, Dora B. Shiro, N.Y.C. Corporation Counsel, N.Y.C. Board of Corrections, Tony Durante, City of New York.For the foregoing reas ons, Maldonado's SAC is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. 31, close the case, and mail a copy of this order and all unpublished decisions cited therein to Maldonado at his address of record. Finally, the Court certifies that, pursuant to 28.U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v.United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/16/2017) (js)
December 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPINION & ORDER: Courts should generally not dismiss a pro se complaint without giving leave to amend at least once if there is any indication that, through a liberal reading of the complaint, a valid claim might be stated. See Cuoco v. M oritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and Maldonado is granted leave to file a second amended complaint by January 6, 2017. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the action pursuant to Rule 41 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and all unpublished decisions cited therein to Maldonado at his address of record. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/14/2016) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maldonado v. Shiro et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angel Maldonado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dora B. Shiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tony Durante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?