The Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, Inc. et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
Plaintiff: The Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, Inc. and Kathleen Howard
Defendant: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Michael Fedorko, Timothy McGovern, Steven Adelhelm and John Does 1-20
Case Number: 1:2015cv03526
Filed: May 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Alison J. Nathan
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 133 OPINION & ORDER re: 120 MOTION in Limine, filed by The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The Court partially GRANTS Port Authority's motion in limine to preclude evidence of Plaintiffs' damages at trial and orders the fol lowing: 1. Discovery in this case is re-opened to allow Port Authority to take supplemental depositions of-or, if Defendant prefers, to obtain affidavits from-Paul Nunziato, John McAusland, Frank Conti, Michael DeFillipis, Robert White, Steve Ek izian, and Cesar Morales, on the topic of their salaries and the number of hours they diverted in connection with Port Authority's cell phone searches. PAPBA will pay for the expenses and costs associated with taking these depositions, eac h of which shall be limited to two hours. All depositions shall be completed by February 28, 2018. If PAPBA is in possession of any unproduced documents that reflect the number of hours the above individuals diverted in connection with the cell phone searches, PAPBA shall produce those documents on or before January 31, 2018. 2. By January 31, 2018, PAPBA shall submit to the Court a letter delineating the following with respect to its damages: (a) PAPBA shall identify the amount of Em ery Celli's fees, if any, it is claiming as damages for work not done in furtherance of this litigation; and (b) PAPBA shall give the reasons why the damages it identified in (a) constitute proper "diversion of resources" damages. (Deposition due by 2/28/2018.) (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 1/19/2018) (ras)
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 112 OPINION & ORDER re: 1 COMPLAINT. This Order sets a schedule for the remaining events in this case. The following deadlines replace all prior deadlines: October 20, 2017: Parties submit (i) joint letter outlining steps that need to be taken before the case is Ready for Trial and (ii) motions in limine; October 27, 2017: Parties submit oppositions to motions in limine; November 3, 2017: Parties submit (i) joint pretrial order and (ii) replies in further support of motions in limine; and November 10, 2017: Case is deemed Ready for Trial. (Motions due by 10/20/2017. Responses due by 10/27/2017. Replies due by 11/3/2017.) (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 10/11/2017) (ras)
October 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion to Amend/Correct: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend as it concerns the addition of the Putative Defendants and the reques t for declaratory relief under § 1983, and otherwise DENIES the motion. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within seven days of this order. No later than seven days after the filing of the amended complaint, the parties shall inform the Court whether any party intends to file a motion for summary judgment and, if so, submit a proposed a briefing schedule. This resolves Dkt. No. 77. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/17/2016) (tn)
May 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The PAPBA's request for the production of the Chertoff and Brosnan Reports is DENIED. The Court finds that the Reports are not relevant to the PAPBA's claims in this case for production pursuant to Rule 26. See FED. R. CIV. P. 26(b)(1). The Chertoff Report in particular does not address the command structure of the Port Authority as alleged by the PAPBA. In any event, the Port Authority's command structure can be obtained through other discovery means. The Port Authority accurately depicted the contents of the Reports in its submissions, and in the April 4 conference before the Court. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 5/6/2016) (kko)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, Inc. et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, Inc.
Represented By: Richard D. Emery
Represented By: Theodor Owen Oxholm
Represented By: Ogilvie Andrew Fraser Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Howard
Represented By: Richard D. Emery
Represented By: Theodor Owen Oxholm
Represented By: Ogilvie Andrew Fraser Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Represented By: Kathleen Gill Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Fedorko
Represented By: Kathleen Gill Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy McGovern
Represented By: Kathleen Gill Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Adelhelm
Represented By: Kathleen Gill Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?