Youngblood v. Pena et al
| Andre Youngblood |
| Louis Pena, T.J., Jesus Sanchez and The City of New York |
| 1:2015cv03541 |
| April 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Analisa Torres |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
166
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 165 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of T.J., Jesus Sanchez, Louis Pena against Andre Youngblood. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated Novem ber 21, 2019, Defendants' summary judgment motion is granted; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 11/21/2019) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal)(km) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On March 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge Pitman issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") recommending that Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment, sought as a sanctionagainst Defendants, pur suant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A), be denied. The Court adopts Judge Pitman's report in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 131. (And as further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/24/2019) (jca)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: re: (23 in 1:16-cv-06100-RA-HBP) MOTION to Dismiss the Operative Complaints Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(f). filed by Louis Pena, City of New York, (57 in 1:15-cv-03541-RA-HBP) MOTION to Dismiss the Operative Complaints Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(f). filed by The City of New York, Louis Pena. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to dismiss the Youngblood I SAC is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Defenda nts' motion to dismiss the Youngblood II Complaint is GRANTED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to: (1) terminate the motions at ECF No. 57 in No. 15-CV-3541 and ECF No. 23 in No. 16-CV-6100; (2) close No. 16-CV-6100; and (3) terminate the City of New York from No. 15-CV-3541. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/24/2017) (rj)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 17 Report and Recommendations. On April 28, 2015, Plaintiff pro se, Andre Youngblood, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 25, 2015, the Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. Plaintiff subsequently filed a document entitled "Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order," ECF No. 14, which the Court construes as an application for a preliminary injunction. After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Pitman issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R & R"), proposing that Plaintiff's application be denied. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. E.g., Levy v. Young Adult Inst., Inc., 13 Civ. 2861, 2015 WL 170442, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2015). The Court finds n o clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety. Plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/10/2015) (ajs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
