Coleman v. System Dialing LLC et al
| Denardo Coleman |
| System Dialing LLC, Jordan McLean, Amir Ziv and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv03868 |
| May 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Copyrights |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff Denardo Coleman (Coleman) alleges that the defendants sold unauthorized recordings of performances by his late father and famed jazz musician, Ornette Coleman. The defendants request that this case be dismisse d with prejudice on the ground that Coleman has failed to prosecute his claims against them. The defendants motion is granted......This action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/11/2017) (gr)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION & ORDER....The defendants May 15 motion to compel arbitration is granted. This action is stayed pending the outcome of arbitration proceedings. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/17/2016) (gr)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER.....Accordingly, Coleman is a proper party for substitution. Because Colemans expanded authority under the Ex Parte Order ends when the Surrogates Court issues a letter of administration, Coleman will be required to updat e the Court on the status of his efforts to become the estates representative in the Surrogates Court. In the event any party other than Coleman is appointed as representative of the estate, the defendants will be permitted to move to dismiss the complaint on the basis that Coleman lacks standing to bring this action. Colemans January 15 motion to substitute parties under Rule 25(a)(1) is granted. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/22/2016) (gr)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION & ORDER....The plaintiffs motion for an extension of time to file a Rule 25 motion pursuant to Rule 6(b) is granted. Defendants October 22, 2015 motion to dismiss is denied insofar as it is predicated on the plaintiffs failure to timely substitute. The Court reserves decision regarding the other issues raised in defendants motion to dismiss. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/18/2015) (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
