Maack v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Maack v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

Maack v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

Plaintiff:	Dorota Von Maack
Defendant:	Wyckoff Heights Medical Center
Case Number:	1:2015cv03951
Filed:	May 22, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Queens
Presiding Judge:	Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 11, 2017	Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Wyckoff Heights Medical Center: Pro se plaintiff Dorota Von Maack brings this action against Wyckoff Heights Medical Center ("Defendant"), alleging, inter alia, employment discrimination and civil rights violations. The Court dismissed Plaintiff's original complaint on June 21, 2016 (the "June 2016 Order"), granting leave to amend Plaintiff's Section 1981 claim and allegations supp orting equitable tolling. Plaintiff subsequently filed an Amended Complaint ("Am. Compl.") on July 21, 2016. Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 36, to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff, and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/8/2017) (jwh)
June 21, 2016	Filing 26 OPINION AND ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, 14 MOTION to Vacate Arbitration filed by Dorota Von Maack. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion to vacate the arbitration award is DENIED. Plaintiff is granted leave to replead her EPA, FMLA, ERISA, and section 1981 claims, including allegations supporting tolling the limitations periods for the first three of these claims. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint shall be filed, if at all, on or before July 21, 2016. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Doc. 10 and 14, and to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff. It is SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Amended Pleadings due by 7/21/2016.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/21/2016) (kko)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 11, 2017

Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Wyckoff Heights Medical Center: Pro se plaintiff Dorota Von Maack brings this action against Wyckoff Heights Medical Center ("Defendant"), alleging, inter alia, employment discrimination and civil rights violations. The Court dismissed Plaintiff's original complaint on June 21, 2016 (the "June 2016 Order"), granting leave to amend Plaintiff's Section 1981 claim and allegations supp orting equitable tolling. Plaintiff subsequently filed an Amended Complaint ("Am. Compl.") on July 21, 2016. Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 36, to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff, and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/8/2017) (jwh)

June 21, 2016

Filing 26 OPINION AND ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, 14 MOTION to Vacate Arbitration filed by Dorota Von Maack. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion to vacate the arbitration award is DENIED. Plaintiff is granted leave to replead her EPA, FMLA, ERISA, and section 1981 claims, including allegations supporting tolling the limitations periods for the first three of these claims. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint shall be filed, if at all, on or before July 21, 2016. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Doc. 10 and 14, and to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff. It is SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Amended Pleadings due by 7/21/2016.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/21/2016) (kko)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maack v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorota Von Maack
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wyckoff Heights Medical Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?